These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8794650)

  • 1. [Peer review's immunity].
    Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z
    Harefuah; 1996 May; 130(9):645-6. PubMed ID: 8794650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What does peer review's 'three in five' policy mean?
    Tseng I
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Jan; 91(1):22. PubMed ID: 19388227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second guessing: physicians scrutinize peer review's effectiveness.
    Borges W
    Tex Med; 2005 Jan; 101(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 15707091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feds' new PROs dismay peer review's fans and foes.
    Frabotta J
    Med World News; 1982 Dec; 23(25):58-60, 65-6, 75, 78. PubMed ID: 10273323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innovative peer review model for rural physicians: system design and implementation.
    Williams JR; Mechler K; Akins RB
    J Rural Health; 2008; 24(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 18643810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Medical experience and the physician's experience].
    Castilla del Pino C
    Rev Neurol; 2006 Oct; 43 Suppl 1():S1-4. PubMed ID: 17061175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review: current law and policy problems.
    Hyman DA
    Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meeting more explicit peer review imperatives.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Aug; 32(8):111-4. PubMed ID: 17763627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidisciplinary peer review 'more objective'.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2008 Apr; 33(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 18689082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospitals coping with the shadow of peer review.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):22-4, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10296739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reviewing for the Singapore Medical Journal.
    Peh WC
    Singapore Med J; 2005 Jan; 46(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15632999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readers' responses to "why should physicians be underlings?".
    Kluger K
    MedGenMed; 2005; 7(3):26; author reply 27. PubMed ID: 16385679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why physicians must improve self-regulation.
    Todd JS
    QA Rev; 1989 Sep; 1(2):4. PubMed ID: 10296758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the Data Bank inhibit peer review?
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1990 Dec; 71(10):58, 62. PubMed ID: 10108010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [What is cognition-based medicine?].
    Kiene H
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(4-5):301-6. PubMed ID: 16044789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review.
    Trostorff DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review not a panacea.
    J Med Soc N J; 1971 Sep; 68(9):697. PubMed ID: 5285949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review of the inexpert witness, or ... do you trust chickens to guard the coop?
    Victoroff MS
    Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):14-6. PubMed ID: 12369343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The National Practitioner Data Bank: a step toward more effective peer review.
    Hackney VH
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jul; 24(7):201-9, 219. PubMed ID: 10111631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.