146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8794662)
1. [Prognostic factors in breast cancer patients].
Roisman I; Peretz T; Reznick AZ; Lifshitz I; Bitterman A; Fares F; Toledano H; Barzilay A; Durst AL
Harefuah; 1996 May; 130(10):693-9. PubMed ID: 8794662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonlinear discriminant analysis and prognostic factor classification in node-negative primary breast cancer using probabilistic neural networks.
Le Goff JM; Lavayssière L; Rouëssé J; Spyratos F
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):2213-8. PubMed ID: 10928180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical-biological meaning of progesterone receptor status in 118 estrogen receptor positive infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast in post-menopausal women].
Ruibal A; Schneider J; Arias J; del Río MC; Núnez MJ; Tejerina A
Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2000 Jun; 19(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11062090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Matrix metalloproteinase expression in human breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study including correlation with cathepsin D, type IV collagen, laminin, fibronectin, EGFR, c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, p53, steroid receptors status and proliferative indices.
Ioachim EE; Athanassiadou SE; Kamina S; Carassavoglou K; Agnantis NJ
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(3A):1665-70. PubMed ID: 9673387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumour epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB-2 and cathepsin D in node-negative invasive breast cancer: their impact on the selection of patients for systemic adjuvant therapy.
Tonkin KS; McKay JW; Stitt LW; Tokmakejian S; Haines DS
Cancer Prev Control; 1999 Apr; 3(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 10474760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic impact of tumor biological factors on survival in node-negative breast cancer.
Harbeck N; Dettmar P; Thomssen C; Henselmann B; Kuhn W; Ulm K; Jänicke F; Höfler H; Graeff H; Schmitt M
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(3C):2187-97. PubMed ID: 9703782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular prognostic factors for breast cancer metastasis and survival.
Esteva FJ; Sahin AA; Cristofanilli M; Arun B; Hortobagyi GN
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2002 Oct; 12(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 12382190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multivariate analysis of DNA ploidy, p53, c-erbB-2 proteins, EGFR, and steroid hormone receptors for prediction of poor short term prognosis in breast cancer.
Eissa S; Khalifa A; el-Gharib A; Salah N; Mohamed MK
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(2B):1417-23. PubMed ID: 9137508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunohistochemical localization of metallothionein in human breast cancer in comparison with cathepsin D, stromelysin-1, CD44, extracellular matrix components, P53, Rb, C-erbB-2, EGFR, steroid receptor content and proliferation.
Ioachim E; Kamina S; Demou A; Kontostolis M; Lolis D; Agnantis NJ
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(3A):2133-9. PubMed ID: 10470161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous quantitative analyses of c-erbB-2 protein, epidermal growth factor receptor, cathepsin D, and hormone receptors in breast cancer.
Iwase H; Itoh Y; Kuzushima T; Yamashita H; Iwata H; Toyama T; Hara Y; Kobayashi S
Cancer Detect Prev; 1997; 21(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9043760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contribution of biology to the therapeutic decision: cancer of the breast in 1995].
Chinot O; Romain S; Martin PM
Bull Cancer Radiother; 1995; 82(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 7546893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognosis prediction of S-phase fraction and p53, c-erbB-2, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor in axillary node-negative breast cancer].
Zhang S; Yuan Y; Wang X
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Aug; 35(8):475-7. PubMed ID: 10678068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of immunohistochemical determination of receptors, tissue proteases, tumor suppressor proteins and proliferation markers as prognostic indicators in primary breast carcinoma].
Göhring UJ; Scharl A; Ahr A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Apr; 56(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 8682282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Male breast cancer: pathological and immunohistochemical features.
Willsher PC; Leach IH; Ellis IO; Bell JA; Elston CW; Bourke JB; Blamey RW; Robertson JF
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(3C):2335-8. PubMed ID: 9245247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the tumor associated proteases cathepsin D (CATH D) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) in cytosols of human breast cancer patients.
Liebert A; Quietzsch D; Beier L
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2571-6. PubMed ID: 10470197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emerging biomarkers and new understanding of traditional markers in personalized therapy for breast cancer.
Dowsett M; Dunbier AK
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Dec; 14(24):8019-26. PubMed ID: 19088018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of image analysis to the evaluation of cellular prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Bacus SS; Ruby SG
Pathol Annu; 1993; 28 Pt 1():179-204. PubMed ID: 8093211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of microglandular adenosis and transition into in situ and invasive carcinoma.
Khalifeh IM; Albarracin C; Diaz LK; Symmans FW; Edgerton ME; Hwang RF; Sneige N
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Apr; 32(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 18300793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current aspects in histopathological assessment of breast cancer].
Sastre X
Bull Cancer; 1997 Jan; 84(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9180862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of radiometric, immunometric, and immunohistochemical methods for the determination of hormonal receptors and quality control of other prognostic parameters in the characterization of carcinoma of the breast].
Piffanelli A; Pelizzola D; Giovannini G; Catozzi L; Uccelli L; Barozzi R; Giganti M
Pathologica; 1992; 84(1094):61-4. PubMed ID: 1363758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]