BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796503)

  • 1. Screening magnetic resonance images versus plain films for low back pain: a randomized trial of effects on patient outcomes.
    Jarvik JG; Deyo RA; Koepsell TD
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S28-31. PubMed ID: 8796503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
    Jarvik JG; Hollingworth W; Martin B; Emerson SS; Gray DT; Overman S; Robinson D; Staiger T; Wessbecher F; Sullivan SD; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    JAMA; 2003 Jun; 289(21):2810-8. PubMed ID: 12783911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes and cost-effectiveness: the payer's perspective.
    Cutler CM
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S33-4. PubMed ID: 8796505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pelvic endometriosis: impact of magnetic resonance imaging on treatment decisions and costs.
    Sugimura K; Imaoka I; Okizuka H
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S66-8. PubMed ID: 8796518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are the top 5 recommendations enough to improve clinical practice?: comment on "Application of 'less is more' to low back pain".
    Wolfson DB
    Arch Intern Med; 2012 Jul; 172(13):1020-2. PubMed ID: 22664829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of “less is more” to low back pain.
    Srinivas SV; Deyo RA; Berger ZD
    Arch Intern Med; 2012 Jul; 172(13):1016-20. PubMed ID: 22664775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid MR imaging versus plain radiography in patients with low back pain: initial results of a randomized study.
    Jarvik JG; Maravilla KR; Haynor DR; Levitz M; Deyo RA
    Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 9240534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mini-intervention for subacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
    Karjalainen K; Malmivaara A; Pohjolainen T; Hurri H; Mutanen P; Rissanen P; Pahkajärvi H; Levon H; Karpoff H; Roine R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):533-40; discussion 540-1. PubMed ID: 12642757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography for mass screening for intracranial aneurysms.
    Takahashi M
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S40-3. PubMed ID: 8796508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The other side of the coin. Applying spinal diagnosis technologies.
    Kyes K
    Rehab Manag; 1996; 9(2):45-6. PubMed ID: 10166564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain.
    Soegaard R; Christensen FB; Christiansen T; Bünger C
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 16871387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Type 1 Modic changes was a significant risk factor for 1-year outcome in sick-listed low back pain patients: a nested cohort study using magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine.
    Jensen OK; Nielsen CV; Sørensen JS; Stengaard-Pedersen K
    Spine J; 2014 Nov; 14(11):2568-81. PubMed ID: 24534386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study.
    Skouen JS; Grasdal AL; Haldorsen EM; Ursin H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 May; 27(9):901-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 11979157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-throughput magnetic resonance imaging.
    Golding SJ
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S53. PubMed ID: 8796513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of economic appraisal in health technology assessment: the Australian case.
    Smith CS; Hailey D; Drummond M
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1653-62. PubMed ID: 8047924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid MRI no better than X-ray in the treatment of low back pain.
    Rollins G
    Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2003 Jul; 14(13):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 12918516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-year prognosis in sick-listed low back pain patients with and without radiculopathy. Prognostic factors influencing pain and disability.
    Jensen OK; Nielsen CV; Stengaard-Pedersen K
    Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):659-75. PubMed ID: 20447871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) provides effective symptom relief in patients with discogenic low back pain.
    Maurer P; Block JE; Squillante D
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18418138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developments and outcomes in Australian diagnostic imaging services.
    Hailey DM
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S92-4. PubMed ID: 8796526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flesh and bone. Medical imaging technology will take low-back injury screening a leap forward and bring the cost back to practical parameters.
    Daniels D; Knight W
    Occup Health Saf; 1995 Jan; 64(1):52-6, 63. PubMed ID: 8606848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.