These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796509)

  • 1. Comparison of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix.
    Hricak H; Yu KK; Powell CB; Subak LL; Stem J; Arenson RL
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S44-6. PubMed ID: 8796509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis.
    Hricak H; Powell CB; Yu KK; Washington E; Subak LL; Stern JL; Cisternas MG; Arenson RL
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 8596840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
    Mezrich R
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of procedures used in staging carcinoma of the cervix.
    Griffin TW; Parker RG; Taylor WJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):825-7. PubMed ID: 973672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of "routine tests" in the staging evaluation of gynecologic malignancies: a cost effectiveness analysis.
    Abayomi O; Dritschilo A; Emami B; Watring WG; Piro AJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1982 Feb; 8(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 6806222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine pretreatment evaluation of patients with gynecologic cancer.
    Lindell LK; Anderson B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 69(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 3808510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.
    Chung H; Ahn HS; Kim YS; Lee EJ; Ryu HS; Chang KH; Kim SJ
    Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
    Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
    Fischerová D; Cibula D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer?
    Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 37(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 17556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
    Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study.
    Choi SH; Kim SH; Choi HJ; Park BK; Lee HJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 15480035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.
    Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography in staging untreated patients with cervical cancer.
    van Engelshoven JM; Versteege CW; Ruys JH; de Haan J; Sanches H
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1984; 18(6):289-95. PubMed ID: 6519559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
    Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix].
    Pellegrino A; Cormio G; Maneo A; Vanzulli A; Villa G; Lissoni A; Landoni F
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Dec; 47(12):523-6. PubMed ID: 8720972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical Cancer Staging in Saudi Arabia Clinicoradiological Correlation.
    Anfinan N
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8745828. PubMed ID: 31341909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.