These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796589)
1. Echogenicity of sonographic contrast media at variable shear rates and concentrations. Kallio T; Alanen A; Bondestam S Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S312-4. PubMed ID: 8796589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Technique for ultrasound imaging with contrast media using nonlinearity and time variance]. Wilkening W; Lazenby J; Ermert H Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():18-9. PubMed ID: 9859236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Perfusion MR imaging of the liver with a vascular contrast agent]. Leporq B; Beuf O; Pilleul F J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 92(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 21501767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doppler intensitometry with BR1, a sonographic contrast agent. Schneider M; Broillet A; Arditi M; Ventrone R; Puginier J Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S308-11. PubMed ID: 8796588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancement of the echogenicity of flowing blood by the contrast agent perflubron. André MP; Steinbach G; Mattrey RF Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 8320067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparative study of the hepatic transit time (HTT) of different ultrasound contrast agents in patients with liver metastases and healthy controls]. Haendl T; Strobel D; Neureiter D; Esser K; Frieser M; Hahn EG; Bernatik T Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):582-8. PubMed ID: 20183780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast measurements in rodent model tumors. Kovar DA; Lipton MJ; Lewis MZ; River JN; Lubich L; Karczmar GS Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S384-6. PubMed ID: 8796609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Placental enhancement with AF0145, a perfluorocarbon-stabilized microbubble sonographic contrast agent. Mattrey RF; Baker KG; Hall LA; Steinbach GC; Peterson T Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S320-1. PubMed ID: 8796592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of semiquantitative ultrasonic perfusion imaging of the brain. Eyding J; Wilkening W; Reckhardt M; Meves S; Postert T J Neuroimaging; 2004 Apr; 14(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 15095560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of injection rate on contrast-enhanced MR angiography image quality: Modulation transfer function analysis. Clark TJ; Wilson GJ; Maki JH Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):357-369. PubMed ID: 27478136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iopromide-carrying liposomes as a contrast agent for the liver. Krause W; Leike J; Schuhmann-Giampieri G; Sachse A; Schmiedl U; Strunk H Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S235-7. PubMed ID: 8796571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of phospholipid-coated microbubbles (MRX-115) on the detection of testicular ischemia in dogs. Metzger-Rose C; Wright WH; Baker MR; Krupinski EA; McCreery TP; Barrette TR; Unger EC Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S315-6. PubMed ID: 8796590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. MR-guided percutaneous intramyocardial injection with an MR-compatible catheter: feasibility and changes in T1 values after injection of extracellular contrast medium in pigs. Krombach GA; Pfeffer JG; Kinzel S; Katoh M; Günther RW; Buecker A Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 15858090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Renal blood flow quantification in pigs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an ex vivo study. Hoeffel C; Mulé S; Huwart L; Frouin F; Jais JP; Helenon O; Correas JM Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 20408121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]