These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796606)

  • 1. Gas-filled microbubbles as novel pressure-sensitive contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.
    Alexander AL; Gmitro AF; Unger EC
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S370-2. PubMed ID: 8796606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbubbles as novel pressure-sensitive MR contrast agents.
    Alexander AL; McCreery TT; Barrette TR; Gmitro AF; Unger EC
    Magn Reson Med; 1996 Jun; 35(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 8744005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional fluid pressure mapping in porous media using magnetic resonance imaging with gas-filled liposomes.
    Morris RH; Bencsik M; Vangala AK; Perrie Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 17466775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of gas-filled microbubble R2* by iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI.
    Chow AM; Chan KW; Cheung JS; Wu EX
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Jan; 63(1):224-9. PubMed ID: 19953509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.
    Forsberg F; Basude R; Liu JB; Alessandro J; Shi WT; Rawool NM; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1203-11. PubMed ID: 10576263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic characterization and contrast imaging of microbubbles encapsulated by polymeric shells coated or filled with magnetic nanoparticles.
    Sciallero C; Grishenkov D; Kothapalli SV; Oddo L; Trucco A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3918-30. PubMed ID: 24180801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency relationships for ultrasonic activation of free microbubbles, encapsulated microbubbles, and gas-filled micropores.
    Miller DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2498-505. PubMed ID: 10491710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Doxorubicin liposome-loaded microbubbles for contrast imaging and ultrasound-triggered drug delivery.
    Escoffre JM; Mannaris C; Geers B; Novell A; Lentacker I; Averkiou M; Bouakaz A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23287915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Air microbubbles as MR susceptibility contrast agent at 1.5 Tesla.
    Ueguchi T; Tanaka Y; Hamada S; Kawamoto R; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H; Johkoh T
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2006 Oct; 5(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 17139140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gas-generating polymeric microspheres for long-term and continuous in vivo ultrasound imaging.
    Min HS; Kang E; Koo H; Lee J; Kim K; Park RW; Kim IS; Choi Y; Kwon IC; Han M
    Biomaterials; 2012 Jan; 33(3):936-44. PubMed ID: 22050793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Filling Gas on Subharmonic Emissions of Phospholipid Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Kanbar E; Fouan D; Sennoga CA; Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):1004-1015. PubMed ID: 28214036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel microbubble construct for intracardiac or intravascular MR manometry: a theoretical study.
    Dharmakumar R; Plewes DB; Wright GA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4745-62. PubMed ID: 16204870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent advances in ultrasound-based diagnosis and therapy with micro- and nanometer-sized formulations.
    Güvener N; Appold L; de Lorenzi F; Golombek SK; Rizzo LY; Lammers T; Kiessling F
    Methods; 2017 Nov; 130():4-13. PubMed ID: 28552267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drug targeting in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Weissleder R; Bogdanov A; Papisov M
    Magn Reson Q; 1992 Mar; 8(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 1567758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo study of microbubbles as an MR susceptibility contrast agent.
    Wong KK; Huang I; Kim YR; Tang H; Yang ES; Kwong KK; Wu EX
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Sep; 52(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15334560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hyperpolarized gases--a new type of MR contrast agents?
    Schad LR; Bachert P; Bock M; Essig M; Knopp MV; Ebert M; Grossmann T; Heil W; Surkau R; Otten EW
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1997; 412():43-6. PubMed ID: 9240079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of fluorous lipid-based nanobubbles for efficiently containing perfluoropropane.
    Oda Y; Suzuki R; Mori T; Takahashi H; Natsugari H; Omata D; Unga J; Uruga H; Sugii M; Kawakami S; Higuchi Y; Yamashita F; Hashida M; Maruyama K
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Jun; 487(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 25841568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging of pulmonary parenchyma and emboli by paramagnetic and superparamagnetic contrast agents.
    Thakur ML; Vinitski S; Mitchell DG; Consigny PM; Lin S; DeFulvio J; Rifkin M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1990; 8(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 2082134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy.
    Dijkmans PA; Juffermans LJ; Musters RJ; van Wamel A; ten Cate FJ; van Gilst W; Visser CA; de Jong N; Kamp O
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2004 Aug; 5(4):245-56. PubMed ID: 15219539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.