155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796676)
1. Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study.
Kallergi M; Clarke LP; Qian W; Gavrielides M; Venugopal P; Berman CG; Holman-Ferris SD; Miller MS; Clark RA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 8796676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: a localization response operating characteristic study.
Kallergi M; Heine JJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Romilly AP; Clark RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 14975972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial resolution in digital mammography.
Karssemeijer N; Frieling JT; Hendriks JH
Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 8496034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.
Cole EB; Pisano ED; Zeng D; Muller K; Aylward SR; Park S; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Walsh R; Baker J; Gimenez EI; Freimanis R
Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):585-95. PubMed ID: 15866131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms.
Leichter I; Lederman R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Buchbinder SS
Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 10353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a wavelet-based computer-assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full-field mammography.
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bollow M; Hermann KG; Richter K; Heinlein P; Schneider W; Hamm B
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 15191095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.
De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B
J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms.
Fam BW; Olson SL; Winter PF; Scholz FJ
Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 3174981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms.
Li L; Qian W; Clarke LP
Acad Radiol; 1997 Nov; 4(11):724-31. PubMed ID: 9365751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of breast calcifications: comparison of contact, magnified, and television-enhanced images.
Kimme-Smith C; Gold RH; Bassett LW; Gormley L; Morioka C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):963-7. PubMed ID: 2801445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Yoshida H; Doi K; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Schmidt RA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 8796725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
