These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796738)

  • 1. Excited skin syndrome.
    Duarte I; Almeida FA; Proença NG
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Mar; 7(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 8796738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients.
    Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Bedrikow R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12022121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing the excited skin syndrome: patch testing hyperirritable skin.
    Mitchell J; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Nov; 37(5):193-9. PubMed ID: 9412745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interference of the position of substances in an epicutaneous patch test battery with the occurrence of false-positive results.
    Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Buense R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Sep; 13(3):125-32. PubMed ID: 12165931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
    Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Persistence of contact allergy: a retrospective analysis.
    Dittmar D; Ofenloch RF; Schuttelaar MLA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Feb; 78(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 29178341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of patch-tests from Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Dermatology Clinic, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from 2003 to 2010.
    Rodrigues DF; Neves DR; Pinto JM; Alves MF; Fulgêncio AC
    An Bras Dermatol; 2012; 87(5):800-3. PubMed ID: 23044584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients.
    Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
    Disphanurat W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.
    Bruze M; Condé-Salazar L; Goossens A; Kanerva L; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):241-50. PubMed ID: 10554056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to a Cell Phone.
    Tammaro A; Magri F; Pigliacelli F; Gelormini E; Parisella Francesca R; Chello C; Persechino S
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):339-340. PubMed ID: 30665487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine patch testing in a dermatology clinic of a teaching hospital in Nigeria.
    Ayanlowo O; Olumide Y
    Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2007; 17(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 18320764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Clinical and Epidemiological Study in a Tertiary Hospital.
    Ortiz Salvador JM; Esteve Martínez A; Subiabre Ferrer D; Victoria Martínez AM; de la Cuadra Oyanguren J; Zaragoza Ninet V
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2017; 108(6):571-578. PubMed ID: 28284423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
    Lazarov A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EAACI position paper for practical patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis in children.
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Darsow U; Mortz CG; Orton D; Worm M; Muraro A; Schmid-Grendelmeier P; Grimalt R; Spiewak R; Rudzeviciene O; Flohr C; Halken S; Fiocchi A; Borrego LM; Oranje AP
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2015 Nov; 26(7):598-606. PubMed ID: 26287570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.