198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8796770)
1. Improved intravaginal controlled-release prostaglandin E2 insert for cervical ripening at term. The Prostaglandin E2 insert Study Group.
Witter FR; Mercer BM
J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 8796770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
Panel P; Bascou V; de Meeus JB; Magnin G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-blind comparison of 2.5 and 5.0 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Smith CV; Miller A; Livezey GT
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 8913976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories.
Buchanan D; Macer J; Yonekura ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 6585733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Clinical trial results.
Trofatter KF
J Reprod Med; 1993 Jan; 38(1 Suppl):78-82. PubMed ID: 8429531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and initiation of labor. Comparison of a multidose gel and single, controlled-release pessary.
Smith CV; Rayburn WF; Miller AM
J Reprod Med; 1994 May; 39(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 8064705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy.
Wang L; Wang G; Cao W; Guo L; Hu H; Li Y; Zhang Q
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Sep; 302(3):579-584. PubMed ID: 32617665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hygroscopic cervical dilators and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized, prospective comparison.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Connor PM
J Reprod Med; 1992 Apr; 37(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 1593561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor.
Atad J; Hallak M; Auslender R; Porat-Packer T; Zarfati D; Abramovici H
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 8559528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining medical and mechanical methods of cervical ripening. Does it increase the likelihood of successful induction of labor?
Sullivan CA; Benton LW; Roach H; Smith LG; Martin RW; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):823-8. PubMed ID: 8951132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized study on removable PGE2 vaginal insert versus PGE2 cervical gel for cervical priming and labor induction in low-Bishop-score pregnancy.
Strobelt N; Meregalli V; Ratti M; Mariani S; Zani G; Morana S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 16553177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
