These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8798170)

  • 1. Measurements of magnetism-related forces and torque moments affecting medical instruments, implants, and foreign objects during magnetic resonance imaging at all degrees of freedom.
    Planert J; Modler H; Vosshenrich R
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 8798170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].
    Sommer T; Maintz D; Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Hofer U; Urbach H; Pavlidis C; Träber F; Schild H; Höher M
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 15122473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Orthodontic brackets in high field MR imaging: experimental evaluation of magnetic field interactions at 3.0 Tesla].
    Kemper J; Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1691-8. PubMed ID: 16333793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers.
    Kagetsu NJ; Litt AW
    Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):505-8. PubMed ID: 2014301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli S; Kanal E
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):587-99. PubMed ID: 8210394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):721-32. PubMed ID: 12451586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds.
    Schenck JF
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):815-50. PubMed ID: 8798169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MRI issues for ballistic objects: information obtained at 1.5-, 3- and 7-Tesla.
    Dedini RD; Karacozoff AM; Shellock FG; Xu D; McClellan RT; Pekmezci M
    Spine J; 2013 Jul; 13(7):815-22. PubMed ID: 23562330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants: 2. Defects on active MRI implants causing hot spots.
    Busch MH; Vollmann W; Grönemeyer DH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16729878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forces and torques produced by a 640-gauss permanent magnet of ferromagnetic objects.
    Sheldon P; Kaufman L; Carlson J
    J Neuroimaging; 1991 Nov; 1(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 10171183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review.
    Shellock FG; Curtis JS
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 2068325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurostimulation systems: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5- and 3-Tesla MR systems.
    Baker KB; Nyenhuis JA; Hrdlicka G; Rezai AR; Tkach JA; Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jan; 21(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 15611943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect on medical metal implants by magnetic fields of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mesgarzadeh M; Revesz G; Bonakdarpour A; Betz RR
    Skeletal Radiol; 1985; 14(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 4059940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of an Apparatus for Digital Measurement of Magnetically Induced Torque on Medical Implants to Facilitate the Application of the ASTM F2213 Standard.
    Heinrich A; Dorschel J; Mohammad Mashoor M; Guttler F; Teichgraber U
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Dec; 66(12):3420-3425. PubMed ID: 30892195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners.
    Kännälä S; Toivo T; Alanko T; Jokela K
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2243-57. PubMed ID: 19293469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):811-4. PubMed ID: 3048071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic forces on orthodontic wires in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 tesla.
    Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G; Kemper J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Nov; 67(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 17124561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.
    Shellock FG; Crues JV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 3260731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodynamic headphones and woofers for application in magnetic resonance imaging scanners.
    Baumgart F; Kaulisch T; Tempelmann C; Gaschler-Markefski B; Tegeler C; Schindler F; Stiller D; Scheich H
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2068-70. PubMed ID: 9800716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.