118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8798175)
1. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.
Gentry JR; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8798175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography.
Warren-Forward HM; Duggan L
Br J Radiol; 2004 May; 77(917):426-32. PubMed ID: 15121707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comment on "TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States" [Med. Phys. 23, 899-903 (1996)].
Nawfel RD
Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):309, 311. PubMed ID: 9048372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric evaluation of the mean glandular dose for mammography in Korean women: a preliminary report.
Oh KK; Hur J; Kim EK; Choo SS
Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 14584104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
Geise RA; Palchevsky A
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mean glandular dose and the standard breast.
Thiele DL; Craig AR
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Jun; 19(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 8826714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.
Kruger RL; Schueler BA
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1449-54. PubMed ID: 11488578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002.
Young KC; Burch A; Oduko JM
Br J Radiol; 2005 Mar; 78(927):207-18. PubMed ID: 15730985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography.
Smathers RL; Boone JM; Lee LJ; Berns EA; Miller RA; Wright AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1414-21. PubMed ID: 17449790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
