These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8799852)

  • 1. Multichannel waveforms and topographic mapping of the auditory brainstem response under common stimulus and recording conditions.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Commun Disord; 1996; 29(3):157-82. PubMed ID: 8799852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of electrode montage on the amplitude of wave V in the auditory brainstem response to maximum length sequence stimuli.
    Dzulkarnain AA; Wilson WJ; Bradley AP; Petoe M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17715464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory-evoked brainstem responses elicited by maximum-length sequences in normal and sensorineural ears.
    Lina-Granade G; Collet L; Morgon A
    Audiology; 1994; 33(4):218-36. PubMed ID: 8067927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of auditory brainstem response waveforms derived ipsilaterally and contralaterally to monaural stimulation.
    Kato T; Shiraishi K; Imamura A; Kimura K; Morizono T; Soda T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1995; 22(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 7487680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ABR topographic mapping with digital filtering using fast Fourier transform.
    Suzuki T; Aoyagi M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():61-70. PubMed ID: 8203245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilaterally recorded auditory brainstem responses to monaural stimulation. Latency and amplitude differences in normal subjects.
    Rosenhamer H; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 7163761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: evidence and mechanisms.
    Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 16439078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The identification of wave I in ABR, ear-canal electrode and electrocochleography].
    Martínez Ibargüen A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1992; 43(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1605961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with the use of acoustic clicks and complex verbal sounds in young adults with learning disabilities.
    Kouni SN; Giannopoulos S; Ziavra N; Koutsojannis C
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 23953938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation of the auditory brainstem response: effects of click intensity, polarity, and position.
    Ballachanda BB; Moushegian G; Stillman RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 1421460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [An optimal electrode position for recording auditory evoked brain stem potentials within the scope of pediatric audiology].
    Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Smukalla K; von Specht H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9577818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory brain stem responses evoked by lateralized clicks: is lateralization extracted in the human brain stem?
    Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2002 Jan; 163(1-2):12-26. PubMed ID: 11788195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of electrode montage on infant auditory brainstem response.
    Katbamna B; Bennett SL; Dokler PA; Metz DA
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 7660057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal correspondence of intracranial, cochlear and scalp-recorded human auditory nerve action potentials.
    Pratt H; Martin WH; Schwegler JW; Rosenwasser RH; Rosenberg SI; Flamm ES
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 1382954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks.
    Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):85-96. PubMed ID: 12121742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of sleep on binaural interaction in auditory brainstem response and middle latency response.
    Suzuki T; Kobayashi K; Aoki K; Umegaki Y
    Audiology; 1992; 31(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 1554330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.