These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8799852)

  • 41. Effects of adaptation on electrocochleography and auditory brain-stem responses in the elderly.
    Soucek S; Mason SM
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 1439500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Auditory brain-stem evoked potentials in cat after kainic acid induced neuronal loss. II. Cochlear nucleus.
    Zaaroor M; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(5):436-45. PubMed ID: 1716569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Isochronic mapping of the auditory brainstem response: normative results.
    Phillips AJ; Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Dec; 29(6):335-46. PubMed ID: 8861409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evidence for efferent effects on early components of the human auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H; Shi Y
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Nov; 108(6):543-53. PubMed ID: 9872425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Response of the primary auditory cortex to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the congenitally deaf white cat.
    Hartmann R; Shepherd RK; Heid S; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):115-33. PubMed ID: 9367234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A guide to the positioning of brainstem implants using intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem responses.
    Nevison B
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():154-166. PubMed ID: 16891841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss.
    Maloff ES; Hood LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.
    Krieg SM; Kempf L; Droese D; Rosahl SK; Meyer B; Lehmberg J
    J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1042-7. PubMed ID: 24559226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Novel Paradigm to Record Bilateral Click-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses Simultaneously (BiSi-ABR).
    Maruthy S; Gnanateja GN; Sebastian C; Sruthi K
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):412-417. PubMed ID: 30541707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of stimulus intensity level on auditory middle latency response brain maps in human adults.
    Tucker DA; Dietrich S; McPherson DL; Salamat MT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 11392434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Test-retest variability of the auditory brainstem response to bone-conducted clicks in newborn infants.
    Yang EY; Stuart A; Stenstrom R; Green WB
    Audiology; 1993; 32(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 8476353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [The sex difference of speech evoked auditory brainstem responses in children and young adults].
    Liu JF; Fu X; Wang D; Li XT; Wang NY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):583-8. PubMed ID: 27625127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Popelár J; Hartmann R; Syka J; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Experimental analyses of the source of ABR wave II.
    Tait C; Miller J; Cycowicz Y; Sohmer H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 244(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 3619753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Auditory brainstem and cortical responses following extensive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Counter SA
    J Neurol Sci; 1994 Jul; 124(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 7964867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. ABR interpeak latencies in rats are shorter at low click intensities.
    Levi H; Sohmer H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 1995; 6(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 8573558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.