BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8800610)

  • 1. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications.
    Karnan M; Thangavel K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17543415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms.
    Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9419517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri FF; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):948-57. PubMed ID: 23508373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Boccignone G; Chianese A; Picariello A
    Comput Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 30(5):267-86. PubMed ID: 10913773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A heuristic approach to automated nipple detection in digital mammograms.
    Jas M; Mukhopadhyay S; Chakraborty J; Sadhu A; Khandelwal N
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):932-40. PubMed ID: 23423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms.
    Kobatake H; Murakami M; Takeo H; Nawano S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 May; 18(5):369-78. PubMed ID: 10416798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fuzzy approach for contrast enhancement of mammography breast images.
    Sahba F; Venetsanopoulos A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():619-26. PubMed ID: 20865547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
    Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11243351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Radiomic feature-based Nipple Detection Algorithm on Digital Mammography.
    Jiang J; Zhang Y; Lu Y; Guo Y; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4381-4391. PubMed ID: 31242321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple method for automatically locating the nipple on mammograms.
    Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):483-94. PubMed ID: 9368104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Self Organizing Map approach to breast cancer detection.
    Oprea AE; Strungaru R; Ungureanu GM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3032-5. PubMed ID: 19163345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.