These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8800788)
1. Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry. Borg J; Møllgaard A; Riis BJ Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 8800788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data. Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand. Bouxsein ML; Michaeli DA; Plass DB; Schick DA; Melton ME Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 9425502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur. Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Measurement of bone density in the wrist using X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with measurements of other sites]. Rey P; Sornay-Rendu E; Garnero P; Vey-Marty B; Delmas PD Rev Rhum Ed Fr; 1994 Oct; 61(9):619-26. PubMed ID: 7858595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects on bone mass after eight years of hormonal replacement therapy. Eiken P; Nielsen SP; Kolthoff N Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jun; 104(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 9197874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study. Forsén L; Berntsen GK; Meyer HE; Tell GS; Fønnebø V; Eur J Epidemiol; 2008; 23(9):615-24. PubMed ID: 18594994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone mineral density measured by a portable X-ray device agrees with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at forearm in preschool aged children. Hazell TJ; Vanstone CA; Rodd CJ; Rauch F; Weiler HA J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 22898084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine. von Wowern N; Storm TL; Olgaard K Calcif Tissue Int; 1988 Mar; 42(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 3130164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in children and adults. Ilich JZ; Hsieh LC; Tzagournis MA; Wright JK; Saracoglu M; Barden HS; Matkovic V Bone; 1994; 15(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 8086236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry. Leboff MS; Fuleihan GE; Angell JE; Chung S; Curtis K J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Jul; 7(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 1642152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurements in calcaneus with DXA and SXA at other skeletal sites: a population-based study on 280 children aged 11-16 years. Sundberg M; Gärdsell P; Johnell O; Ornstein E; Sernbo I Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 9850347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of peripheral skeletal assessment at the radius in estimating femoral bone density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a comparative study of single-photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Boonen S; Cheng X; Nicholson PH; Verbeke G; Broos P; Dequeker J J Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 242(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 9366811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term change in the bone mineral density of adults with adult onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency in response to short or long-term GH replacement therapy. Rahim A; Holmes SJ; Adams JE; Shalet SM Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1998 Apr; 48(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 9640413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the radius. Nelson D; Feingold M; Mascha E; Kleerekoper M Bone Miner; 1992 Jul; 18(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 1422300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of low bone mass and prediction of fracture risk using metacarpal radiogrammetry method: a comparative study with DXA and X-ray phantom. Ashok Kumar D; Anburajan M; Snekhalatha U Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 Jul; 21(7):1350-1371. PubMed ID: 29968333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]