102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8800870)
1. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography.
Brettle DS; Workman A; Ellwood RP; Launders JH; Horner K; Davies RM
Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):256-61. PubMed ID: 8800870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systems.
Sakurai T; Kawamata R; Kozai Y; Kaku Y; Nakamura K; Saito M; Wakao H; Kashima I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 20395461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
Workman A; Brettle DS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system.
Hillen W; Schiebel U; Zaengel T
Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):744-51. PubMed ID: 3683303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 10490745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of physical imaging properties among three kinds of imaging plates used in photostimulable phosphor systems for dental radiography.
Nishikawa K; Ooguro T; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2002 Feb; 43(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective and subjective evaluations of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film.
Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 7614190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
