These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 880106)

  • 1. A comparison of three hearing aid evaluation procedures for young children.
    Schwartz DM; Larson VD
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Jul; 103(7):401-406. PubMed ID: 880106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The development of auditory performance and speech intelligibility at the early stage after hearing aid fitting in children with moderate or severe hearing loss].
    Jing LV; Chen X; Zhang H; Li J; Wu Y; Wang S; Kong Y; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24616979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Language Outcomes in Young Children with Mild to Severe Hearing Loss.
    Tomblin JB; Harrison M; Ambrose SE; Walker EA; Oleson JJ; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):76S-91S. PubMed ID: 26731161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle.
    Litovsky RY; Johnstone PM; Godar S; Agrawal S; Parkinson A; Peters R; Lake J
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 16446564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic aspects of auditory training with and without hearing aid.
    Ludvigsen C
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980; (Suppl 10):69-83. PubMed ID: 6934609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing aid selection and usage in young hearing-impaired children.
    Ross M; Lerman JW
    Conn Med; 1966 Nov; 30(11):793-5. PubMed ID: 5979180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing aid use in Finnish children--impact of hearing loss variables and detection delay.
    Marttila TI; Karikoski JO
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 16174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory performance of young children with hearing aids: the Nijmegen experience.
    Snik AF; Neijenhuis K; Hoekstra CC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (53):61-7. PubMed ID: 11409779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing Aids Do Not Alter Cortical Entrainment to Speech at Audible Levels in Mild-to-Moderately Hearing-Impaired Subjects.
    Vanheusden FJ; Kegler M; Ireland K; Georga C; Simpson DM; Reichenbach T; Bell SL
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():109. PubMed ID: 32317951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/bimodal hearing devices.
    Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M; van Wanrooy E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():6-11. PubMed ID: 17063004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.