These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8801136)

  • 41. Magnetic-activated cell sorting for sperm preparation reduces spermatozoa with apoptotic markers and improves the acrosome reaction in couples with unexplained infertility.
    Lee TH; Liu CH; Shih YT; Tsao HM; Huang CC; Chen HH; Lee MS
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Apr; 25(4):839-46. PubMed ID: 20150175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The value of intrauterine insemination with washed husband's sperm in the treatment of infertility.
    Gerris JM; Delbeke LO; Punjabi U; Buytaert P
    Hum Reprod; 1987 May; 2(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 3624430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system.
    Hamilton JA; Cissen M; Brandes M; Smeenk JM; de Bruin JP; Kremer JA; Nelen WL; Hamilton CJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1110-21. PubMed ID: 25788568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination.
    Ruiter-Ligeti J; Agbo C; Dahan M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):218-224. PubMed ID: 27990794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study.
    Muriel L; Meseguer M; Fernández JL; Alvarez J; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Garrido N
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):738-44. PubMed ID: 16311292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does transcervical intra-fallopian insemination improve pregnancy rates in cases of oligoteratoasthenozoospermia? A prospective, randomized study.
    Levitas E; Lunenfeld E; Bearman JE; Albotiano S; Sonin Y; Weiss N; Potashnik G
    Andrologia; 1999 May; 31(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 10363123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Number of spermatozoa in the crypts of the sperm reservoir at about 24 h after a low-dose intrauterine and deep intrauterine insemination in sows.
    Tummaruk P; Tienthai P
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2010 Apr; 45(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 18992120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The value of artificial insemination with husband's semen in infertility due to failure of postcoital sperm-mucus penetration--controlled trial of treatment.
    Glazener CM; Coulson C; Lambert PA; Watt EM; Hinton RA; Kelly NJ; Hull MG
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Aug; 94(8):774-8. PubMed ID: 3311134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of intrauterine insemination with washed spermatozoa from the husband in the treatment of infertility.
    Tarlatzis BC; Bontis J; Kolibianakis EM; Sanopoulou T; Papadimas J; Lagos S; Mantalenakis S
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Oct; 6(9):1241-6. PubMed ID: 1752925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. IUI in male subfertility: are we able to select the proper patients?
    van Weert JM; Repping S; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Nov; 11(5):624-31. PubMed ID: 16409715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Intra-uterine insemination with activated sperm. Results of conception compared in the various types of infertility in spouses].
    Emperaire JC; Verdaguer S; Meulet-Girard Y; Audebert AJ
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 3397501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sperm migration in pigs after deep intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination.
    Brüssow KP; Torner H; Rátky J
    J Reprod Dev; 2011 Jun; 57(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 21258178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Goverde AJ; McDonnell J; Vermeiden JP; Schats R; Rutten FF; Schoemaker J
    Lancet; 2000 Jan; 355(9197):13-8. PubMed ID: 10615885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
    Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility.
    Shibahara H; Obara H; Ayustawati ; Hirano Y; Suzuki T; Ohno A; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M
    Int J Androl; 2004 Apr; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15149462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination.
    Zhao Y; Vlahos N; Wyncott D; Petrella C; Garcia J; Zacur H; Wallach EE
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 May; 21(5):143-8. PubMed ID: 15279320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success.
    Karabinus DS; Gelety TJ
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Mar; 67(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 9091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of sperm count on success of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility.
    Zhang E; Tao X; Xing W; Cai L; Zhang B
    Mater Sociomed; 2014 Oct; 26(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 25568631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Routine intrauterine insemination and the effect of spermatozoal washing as assessed by computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Tucker MJ; Chan YM; Wong CJ; Leong MK; Leung CK
    Int J Fertil; 1991; 36(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 1674932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.