371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8801188)
1. The effect of recombination on background selection.
Nordborg M; Charlesworth B; Charlesworth D
Genet Res; 1996 Apr; 67(2):159-74. PubMed ID: 8801188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Background selection and population differentiation.
Hu XS; He F
J Theor Biol; 2005 Jul; 235(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 15862590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.
Charlesworth B; Morgan MT; Charlesworth D
Genetics; 1993 Aug; 134(4):1289-303. PubMed ID: 8375663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of deleterious mutations on linked, neutral variation in small populations.
Pálsson S; Pamilo P
Genetics; 1999 Sep; 153(1):475-83. PubMed ID: 10471727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving the Conflict Between Associative Overdominance and Background Selection.
Zhao L; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2016 Jul; 203(3):1315-34. PubMed ID: 27182952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nucleotide variation along the Drosophila melanogaster fourth chromosome.
Wang W; Thornton K; Berry A; Long M
Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5552):134-7. PubMed ID: 11778050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.
Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2012 May; 191(1):233-46. PubMed ID: 22377629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model.
Hamblin MT; Aquadro CF
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Oct; 13(8):1133-40. PubMed ID: 8865667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the effects of background selection in small populations on comparisons of molecular variation.
Pálsson S
Hereditas; 2004; 141(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 15383075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deleterious background selection with recombination.
Hudson RR; Kaplan NL
Genetics; 1995 Dec; 141(4):1605-17. PubMed ID: 8601498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Hill-Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak selection and linkage in finite populations.
Comeron JM; Williford A; Kliman RM
Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Jan; 100(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 17878920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Searching for evidence of positive selection in the human genome using patterns of microsatellite variability.
Payseur BA; Cutter AD; Nachman MW
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jul; 19(7):1143-53. PubMed ID: 12082133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection on a modifier of recombination rate due to linked deleterious mutations.
Pálsson S
J Hered; 2002; 93(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 12011171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
Otto SP; Feldman MW
Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
Kliman RM; Hey J
Mol Biol Evol; 1993 Nov; 10(6):1239-58. PubMed ID: 8277853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic linkage and natural selection.
Barton NH
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2559-69. PubMed ID: 20643746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of selection against deleterious mutations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely inbreeding populations.
Wang J; Hill WG
Genetics; 1999 Nov; 153(3):1475-89. PubMed ID: 10545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda.
Bachtrog D
Nat Genet; 2004 May; 36(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 15107853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.
Marais G; Piganeau G
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Sep; 19(9):1399-406. PubMed ID: 12200468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
