These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat. Gardi J; Merzenich M; McKean C Audiology; 1979; 18(5):358-81. PubMed ID: 496719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip. Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory brainstem response in the cat. Effect of masking level on derived-band contributions. Mair IW; Laukli E Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 103(5-6):586-92. PubMed ID: 3618185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans. Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Feb; 38(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 45941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of auditory brain stem response sources along the basilar membrane to low-frequency filtered clicks. Kinarti R; Sohmer H Isr J Med Sci; 1982 Jan; 18(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 7068347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brainstem evoked response (BER) audiometry at various stimulus presentation rates. Weber BA; Fujikawa SM J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 914673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig]. Dum N; von Wedel H Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The audiometric utility of brain stem responses to low-frequency sounds. Davis H; Hirsh SK Audiology; 1976; 15(3):181-95. PubMed ID: 938332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials (ASSEPs): a study of optimal stimulation parameters for frequency-specific threshold measurement in dogs. Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Deggouj N; Deltenre P Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1760-71. PubMed ID: 16798083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Brief acoustic stimuli for the recording of brain stem potentials by computer controlled system analysis]. Kleberc G; Seifert K Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1983 Oct; 62(10):487-92. PubMed ID: 6645752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical considerations in the interpretation of auditory brainstem response audiometry. Jacobson JT; Novotny GM; Elliott S J Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 9(6):493-504. PubMed ID: 7206036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative diagnostic test for active Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops using high-pass noise masked responses: the complex amplitude ratio. Don M; Kwong B; Tanaka C Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 17664867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory brainstem responses to clicks in neonates. Durieux-Smith A; Edwards CG; Picton TW; McMurray B J Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985 Feb; 14():12-8. PubMed ID: 3864988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. Smith JC; Marsh JT; Brown WS Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Nov; 39(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 52439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Auditory response of the brain stem and its application to objective audiometry]. Suzuki T; Horiuchi K; Koizumi S Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1974 Aug; 77(8):587-92. PubMed ID: 4473524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study. Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Suzuki JI Audiology; 1979; 18(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 496720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]