240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8803346)
1. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.
Buser D; Schenk RK; Steinemann S; Fiorellini JP; Fox CH; Stich H
J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Jul; 25(7):889-902. PubMed ID: 1918105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae.
Masuda T; Salvi GE; Offenbacher S; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):472-85. PubMed ID: 9274076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological fixation of endosseous implants.
Franchi M; Fini M; Martini D; Orsini E; Leonardi L; Ruggeri A; Giavaresi G; Ottani V
Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):665-71. PubMed ID: 16233979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in rabbit cortical bone using longitudinal and transverse histologic sections.
Rebollal J; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20386217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant--bone interface.
Steflik DE; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Davis HC; Adams BO; Yavari J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8820118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric analysis of a half hydroxyapatite-coated implant in humans: a pilot study.
Iamoni F; Rasperini G; Trisi P; Simion M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 10531745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Collagen fiber orientation around machined titanium and zirconia dental implant necks: an animal study.
Tetè S; Mastrangelo F; Bianchi A; Zizzari V; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19344025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of two types of retrieved human titanium implants.
Hayakawa T; Kiba H; Yasuda S; Yamamoto H; Nemoto K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Apr; 22(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 12019712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A histomorphometric study of tissue interface by laminar implant test in rats.
Guglielmotti MB; Renou S; Cabrini RL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):565-70. PubMed ID: 10453673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
