These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8804140)

  • 1. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mounting a community-randomized trial: sample size, matching, selection, and randomization issues in PRISM.
    Watson L; Small R; Brown S; Dawson W; Lumley J
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Jun; 25(3):235-50. PubMed ID: 15157727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal multivariate matching before randomization.
    Greevy R; Lu B; Silber JH; Rosenbaum P
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):263-75. PubMed ID: 15054030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
    Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cluster without fluster: The effect of correlated outcomes on inference in randomized clinical trials.
    Proschan M; Follmann D
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):795-809. PubMed ID: 17594680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A SAS macro for sample size adjustment and randomization test for internal pilot study.
    Wang S; Xia J; Yu L; Li C; Xu L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Apr; 90(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 18192069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
    Feng W; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of community-intervention trials via generalized linear mixed models.
    Yasui Y; Feng Z; Diehr P; McLerran D; Beresford SA; McCulloch CE
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 15606425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomization as a basis for inference in noninferiority trials.
    Wiens BL
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17128425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The merits of breaking the matches: a cautionary tale.
    Donner A; Taljaard M; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):2036-51. PubMed ID: 16927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The usefulness of matched pair randomization for medical practice-based research.
    McClatchey MW; Cohen SJ; Reed FM
    Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Sep; 12(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 1414427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.
    Imai K
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4857-73. PubMed ID: 18618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some design issues of strata-matched non-randomized studies with survival outcomes.
    Mazumdar M; Tu D; Zhou XK
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(23):3949-59. PubMed ID: 16596571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
    Strickland PA; Lu SE
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.