These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8804281)

  • 1. Dynamic test to diagnose loose uncemented femoral total hip components.
    Berger R; Fletcher F; Donaldson T; Wasielewski R; Peterson M; Rubash H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Sep; (330):115-23. PubMed ID: 8804281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of contrast arthrography in assessing loosening of symptomatic uncemented total hip components.
    Barrack RL; Tanzer M; Kattapuram SV; Harris WH
    Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 8160035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
    Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Poldi-Čech cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty after 25 years].
    Rozkydal Z; Janíček P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Aug; 77(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 21059325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast and nuclear arthrography in loosening of the uncemented hip prosthesis.
    Swan JS; Braunstein EM; Wellman HN; Capello W
    Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2000499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Mulroy WF; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1845-52. PubMed ID: 8550652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.
    El-Husseiny M; Haddad FS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2157-63. PubMed ID: 27334323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?
    Müller M; Abdel MP; Wassilew GI; Duda G; Perka C
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1615-22. PubMed ID: 26637674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using the same femoral component.
    Meding JB; Ritter MA; Davis KE; Hillery M
    Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 26449330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative measurement of rotational stability of femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Harris WH; Mulroy RD; Maloney WJ; Burke DW; Chandler HP; Zalenski EB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 May; (266):119-26. PubMed ID: 2019039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary cementless hip arthroplasty with a titanium plasma sprayed prosthesis.
    Hozack WJ; Rothman RH; Eng K; Mesa J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):217-25. PubMed ID: 8981899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The uncemented cup of the CLS Spotorno joint endoprosthesis--5-years' results].
    Cech O; Dzupa V; Svatos F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 11706709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Smith SW; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9840632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical comparison of the thrust plate prosthesis and a stemmed prosthesis.
    Karatosun V; Unver B; Gultekin A; Gunal I
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 21960448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.