These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8804677)

  • 1. Postingestive factors influencing operant sugar intake in pigs.
    Baldwin BA
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Jul; 60(1):283-6. PubMed ID: 8804677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of gastric and postgastric sites in glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.
    Drucker DB; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Feb; 61(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 9035269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intracerebroventricular injection of CCK reduces operant sugar intake in pigs.
    Baldwin BA; Sukhchai S
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Jul; 60(1):231-3. PubMed ID: 8804668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety.
    Sclafani A; Nissenbaum JW; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Aug; 56(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 7938246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of duodenal osmotic loads on spontaneous meals in pigs.
    Houpt TR; Baldwin BA; Houpt KA
    Physiol Behav; 1983 May; 30(5):787-95. PubMed ID: 6878483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased flavor acceptance and preference conditioned by the postingestive actions of glucose.
    Pérez C; Lucas F; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 9761222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of portal and jugular infused glucose, mannitol and saline on food intake in dogs.
    Bellinger LL; Williams FE
    Physiol Behav; 1989 Oct; 46(4):693-8. PubMed ID: 2557647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons.
    Warwick ZS; Bowen KJ; Synowski SJ
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 62(6):1319-24. PubMed ID: 9383120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforcer devaluation in palatability-based learned flavor preferences.
    Dwyer DM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 16248735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tasting fat: cephalic phase hormonal responses and food intake in restrained and unrestrained eaters.
    Crystal SR; Teff KL
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Sep; 89(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 16846622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and incentive value measured by progressive ratio licking in rats.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Jun; 88(1-2):88-94. PubMed ID: 16626765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The production of satiety by means of intraduodenal glucose infusions in the pig [proceedings].
    Heron F; Stephens DB
    J Physiol; 1978 Nov; 284():14P-15P. PubMed ID: 731486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis.
    Myers KP; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2001; 74(4-5):481-93. PubMed ID: 11790408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. All-or-none suppression of glucose sham feeding by an intragastric mixed meal in rats.
    Mook DG; Wagner S; Hartline DF
    Behav Neurosci; 1991 Oct; 105(5):712-20. PubMed ID: 1815621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose. II. Taste reactivity analysis.
    Myers KP; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2001; 74(4-5):495-505. PubMed ID: 11790409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rats acquire stronger preference for flavors consumed towards the end of a high-fat meal.
    Myers KP
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Feb; 110-111():179-89. PubMed ID: 23313407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Appetite; 2004 Jun; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 15183920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: taste versus postingestive conditioning.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Aug; 56(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 7938256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deafferentation affects short-term but not long-term control of food intake.
    van de Wall EH; Pomp ER; Strubbe JH; Scheurink AJ; Koolhaas JM
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Mar; 84(4):659-67. PubMed ID: 15811402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus specificity in flavor acceptance learning.
    Ramirez I
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Aug; 60(2):595-610. PubMed ID: 8840924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.