These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805771)

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of a presence/absence microbiological assay: the hard surface carrier test of disinfectant efficacy.
    Hamilton MA; DeVries TA
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1112-20. PubMed ID: 8805771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian analysis of quantitative antimicrobial assays.
    Varbanov AR; Taylor CH
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1517-26. PubMed ID: 12704613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses on surfaces compared with other micro-organisms and impact of suboptimal disinfectant exposure.
    Howie R; Alfa MJ; Coombs K
    J Hosp Infect; 2008 Aug; 69(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 18602193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: bacterial attachment and surface texture.
    Cole EC; Rutala WA; Carson JL
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1987; 70(5):903-6. PubMed ID: 3119561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virucidal activity of a quaternary ammonium compound disinfectant against feline calicivirus: a surrogate for norovirus.
    Jimenez L; Chiang M
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 Jun; 34(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 16765204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Model of bacteriologic effectiveness testing of disinfectants for veterinary medicine].
    Kleiner U; Trenner P
    Arch Exp Veterinarmed; 1990; 44(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 2188627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1.
    Gutiérrez CB; Rodríguez Barbosa JI; Suárez J; González OR; Tascón RI; Rodríguez Ferri EF
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Aug; 56(8):1025-9. PubMed ID: 8533973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quantitative recovery of bacteria from different germ carrier materials].
    Hunger W; Höller C; Gundermann KO
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 2118354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The determination of the bacterial effectiveness of surface disinfectants using suspension tests].
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 Mar; 191(2-3):206-15. PubMed ID: 2059284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the efficacy of a peroxygen disinfectant-filled footmat for reduction of bacterial load on footwear in a large animal hospital setting.
    Dunowska M; Morley PS; Patterson G; Hyatt DR; Van Metre DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Jun; 228(12):1935-9. PubMed ID: 16784389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimicrobial effectiveness of 2% glutaraldehyde versus other disinfectants for hospital equipment, in an in vitro test based on germ-carriers with a high microbial contamination.
    Herruzo-Cabrera R; Uriarte MC; Rey-Calero J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1999 Dec; 100(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 10672649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of enzymatic cleaning agents and disinfectants against bacterial biofilms.
    Augustin M; Ali-Vehmas T; Atroshi F
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2004 Feb; 7(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15144735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluorescent assay based on resazurin for detection of activity of disinfectants against bacterial biofilm.
    Mariscal A; Lopez-Gigosos RM; Carnero-Varo M; Fernandez-Crehuet J
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 82(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 19198831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hard surface carrier test as a quantitative test of disinfection: a collaborative study.
    Hamilton MA; DeVries TA; Rubino JR
    J AOAC Int; 1995; 78(4):1102-9. PubMed ID: 7580324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy comparisons of disinfectants used by the commercial poultry industry.
    Ruano M; El-Attrache J; Villegas P
    Avian Dis; 2001; 45(4):972-7. PubMed ID: 11785901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commonly used farm disinfectants can select for mutant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with decreased susceptibility to biocides and antibiotics without compromising virulence.
    Randall LP; Cooles SW; Coldham NG; Penuela EG; Mott AC; Woodward MJ; Piddock LJ; Webber MA
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Dec; 60(6):1273-80. PubMed ID: 17897935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rapid method for determining the tuberculocidal activity of liquid chemical germicides.
    Erickson BD; Campbell WL; Cerniglia CE
    Curr Microbiol; 2001 Aug; 43(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 11391467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the response rate in the presence of measurement error.
    Qu Y; Kulkarni PM; Sanger TM
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 16526011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of disinfectants on military NATO and DECON litters.
    Hensley DM
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18507304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Activity of selected oxidizing microbicides against the spores of Clostridium difficile: relevance to environmental control.
    Perez J; Springthorpe VS; Sattar SA
    Am J Infect Control; 2005 Aug; 33(6):320-5. PubMed ID: 16061137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.