BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805772)

  • 1. Statistical analysis of animal cancer chemoprevention experiments.
    Marimuthu P
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1157. PubMed ID: 8805772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analysis of animal cancer chemoprevention experiments.
    Freedman LS; Midthune DN; Brown CC; Steele V; Kelloff GJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 8513108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric tests of tumor prevalence data.
    Sun J; Kalbfleisch JD
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):726-31. PubMed ID: 8672708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume III--The design and analysis of long-term animal experiments.
    Gart JJ; Krewski D; Lee PN; Tarone RE; Wahrendorf J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (79):1-219. PubMed ID: 3301661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of genetically engineered mouse models of prostate cancer for nutrition and cancer chemoprevention research.
    Klein RD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 576(1-2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15885713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The utility of genetically altered mouse models for nutrition and cancer chemoprevention research.
    Hursting SD; Nunez NP; Patel AC; Perkins SN; Lubet RA; Barrett JC
    Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 576(1-2):80-92. PubMed ID: 15990122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical considerations and techniques for understanding physiological data, modeling, and treatments.
    Fitzpatrick BG
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2008 Jun; 8(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 18172762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robustness and power.
    Laviano A; Pagano M
    Nutrition; 1995; 11(6):773. PubMed ID: 8719142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgement post-stratification for designed experiments.
    Du J; MacEachern SN
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 17888038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the interpretation of "mean +/- s", II. Alternative questions and answers.
    Jílek M
    Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha); 1993; 39(1-4):9-31. PubMed ID: 9355658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A reexamination of the cell-lineage data of E. O. Powell.
    Staudte RG; Zhang J; Huggins RM; Cowan R
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1214-22. PubMed ID: 8962451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variable selection for clustering with Gaussian mixture models.
    Maugis C; Celeux G; Martin-Magniette ML
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 19210744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter to the editor.
    Rubio FJ; Pérez-Elizalde S
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):736-8. PubMed ID: 19655311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regression analysis of panel count data with dependent observation times.
    Sun J; Tong X; He X
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 18078478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using projection for testing goodness-of-fit in regression models for repeated measures.
    Qu RP; Palta M
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1259-67. PubMed ID: 8962453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Box-Cox transformation of left-censored data with application to the analysis of coronary artery calcification and pharmacokinetic data.
    Han C; Kronmal R
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3671-9. PubMed ID: 15534890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Circular distributions based on nonnegative trigonometric sums.
    Fernández-Durán JJ
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):499-503. PubMed ID: 15180676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the predictive performance of prognostic models for censored survival data with time-dependent covariates.
    Schoop R; Graf E; Schumacher M
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):603-10. PubMed ID: 17764480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A latent process regression model for spatially correlated count data.
    McShane LM; Albert PS; Palmatier MA
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):698-706. PubMed ID: 9192458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the principal stratification approach to the Faenza randomized experiment on breast self-examination.
    Mattei A; Mealli F
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):437-46. PubMed ID: 17688496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.