122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805817)
1. Memory for faces: evidence of retrieval-based impairment.
Windschitl PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1101-22. PubMed ID: 8805817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits.
Cabeza R; Bruce V; Kato T; Oda M
Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):139-51. PubMed ID: 10087863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.
McKone E; Peh YX
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final modified tests: evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis.
Belli RF
Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(3):407-27. PubMed ID: 8238667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Memory for faces: encoding and retrieval operations.
Wells GL; Hryciw B
Mem Cognit; 1984 Jul; 12(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 6503696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Processes of memory loss, recovery, and distortion.
Estes WK
Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):148-69. PubMed ID: 9009883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces.
Levin DT; Beale JM
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Feb; 62(2):386-401. PubMed ID: 10723217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is face distinctiveness gender based?
Baudouin JY; Gallay M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 16846279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.
Light LL; Kayra-Stuart F; Hollander S
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 May; 5(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 528913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parts and wholes in face recognition.
Tanaka JW; Farah MJ
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1993 May; 46(2):225-45. PubMed ID: 8316637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prime time advertisements: repetition priming from faces seen on subject recruitment posters.
Bruce V; Carson D; Burton AM; Kelly S
Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):502-15. PubMed ID: 9610121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.
Kemp R; McManus C; Pigott T
Perception; 1990; 19(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 2096371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.
Kellogg RT; Cocklin T; Bourne LE
Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 7137417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of lateral reversal on recognition memory for photographs of faces.
McKelvie SJ
Br J Psychol; 1983 Aug; 74 (Pt 3)():391-407. PubMed ID: 6616130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aging and memory for pictures of faces.
Bartlett JC; Leslie JE; Tubbs A; Fulton A
Psychol Aging; 1989 Sep; 4(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 2803620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.
Diamond R; Carey S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Jun; 115(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 2940312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impaired discrimination of familiar from unfamiliar faces.
Young AW; Flude BM; Hay DC; Ellis AW
Cortex; 1993 Mar; 29(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 8472559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.
Kunar MA; Flusberg S; Wolfe JM
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18372752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repetition priming from incomplete faces: evidence for part to whole completion.
Brunas J; Young AW; Ellis AW
Br J Psychol; 1990 Feb; 81 ( Pt 1)():43-56. PubMed ID: 2322764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep--deeper--deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces.
Sporer SL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Mar; 17(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 1827834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
