These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805819)

  • 1. On the generality of the revelation effect.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1147-53. PubMed ID: 8805819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 9530844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?
    Verde MF; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 14516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging and the revelation effect.
    Thapar A; Sniezek SM
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):473-7. PubMed ID: 18573022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The revelation effect: when disguising test items induces recognition.
    Watkins MJ; Peynircioglu ZF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1012-20. PubMed ID: 2148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
    Bäuml KH; Aslan A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of associates and activation of synonyms in the rare-word paradigm: Further evidence for a center--surround mechanism.
    Barnhardt TM; Glisky EL; Polster MR; Elam L
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 8822158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Osborn K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 19271869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory.
    Flory P; Pring L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 7754080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality effects in sentence recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Part-set cuing of false memories.
    Reysen MB; Nairne JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 12120805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Remembering" words not presented in lists: relevance to the current recovered/false memory controversy.
    Freyd JJ; Gleaves DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):811-3; discussion 814-6. PubMed ID: 8656157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using overt rehearsals to explain word frequency effects in free recall.
    Ward G; Woodward G; Stevens A; Stinson C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):186-210. PubMed ID: 12696809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.