These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805820)

  • 1. Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1154-65. PubMed ID: 8805820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: further support for the changing state hypothesis.
    Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):143-60. PubMed ID: 8177959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Nov; 20(6):1396-408. PubMed ID: 7983471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Neely CB; Wilson JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):472-83. PubMed ID: 9080015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.
    Farley LA; Neath I; Allbritton DW; Surprenant AM
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 17533889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    Neely CB; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
    Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall.
    Seiler KH; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):954-64. PubMed ID: 14516227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serial position, rehearsal and recall in temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Powell GE; Sutherland G; Agu GA
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1984 May; 23 ( Pt 2)():153-4. PubMed ID: 6722382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irrelevant speech, changing state, and order information.
    MacDermid AE; Duggan VA; Miller BL; Neath I; Surprenant AM
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Nov; 51(8):1836-1848. PubMed ID: 37326785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
    Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
    Buchner A; Mehl B; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 17128604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
    Neath I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall.
    McDowd J; Madigan S
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 1895947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.