157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805912)
21. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1998; 18(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9785218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility of a method for analysis of morphological changes in perioral soft tissue in children using video cameras.
Miyakawa T; Morinushi T; Yamasaki Y
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 16512886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-dimensional computer-graphic demonstration of facial soft tissue changes in mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Techalertpaisarn P; Kuroda T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 9835821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Facial esthetics in a selected Saudi population.
Al-Jasser NM
Saudi Med J; 2003 Sep; 24(9):1000-5. PubMed ID: 12973487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of computerized video imaging in predicting adult extraction treatment outcomes.
Le TN; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 9770096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Soft tissue facial morphology in obese adolescents: a three-dimensional noninvasive assessment.
Ferrario VF; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM; Turci M; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 15038489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A three-dimensional study of facial mimicry in healthy young adults.
Sforza C; Galante D; Shirai YF; Ferrario VF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 19932974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system.
Kau CH; Richmond S; Zhurov AI; Knox J; Chestnutt I; Hartles F; Playle R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 16214622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to measure facial soft tissue depth.
Vander Pluym J; Shan WW; Taher Z; Beaulieu C; Plewes C; Peterson AE; Beattie OB; Bamforth JS
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Jan; 44(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 17214523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements.
Ozdemir ST; Sigirli D; Ercan I; Cankur NS
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 19089493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation.
Rosati R; De Menezes M; Rossetti A; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 20620838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional facial morphometry in skeletal Class III patients. A non-invasive study of soft-tissue changes before and after orthognathic surgery.
Sforza C; Peretta R; Grandi G; Ferronato G; Ferrario VF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16483700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Retrospective evaluation of facial soft tissue cephalometric parameters in adolescents with normal occlusion.
Poosti M; Ramezanzadeh B; Salehi T; Rashed R
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 20687311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A proportional analysis of the soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion.
Lundström A; Forsberg CM; Peck S; McWilliam J
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(2):127-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 1626746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
