These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805916)

  • 1. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands.
    Wood DP; Paleczny GJ; Johnson LN
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 8805916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Sandblasting and Type of Cement on the Bond Strength of Molar Bands on Stainless Steel Crowns.
    Bawazir OA; Elaraby A; Alshamrani H; Salama FS
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2015; 82(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 26349792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.
    Raghunath Reddy MH; Subba Reddy VV; Basappa N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21273711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Williams PH; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 15947223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sandblasting of bands to increase bond strength.
    Miller S; Zernik JH
    J Clin Orthod; 1996 Apr; 30(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 8975020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
    Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements.
    Norris DS; McInnes-Ledoux P; Schwaninger B; Weinberg R
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 3513596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements.
    Aggarwal M; Foley TF; Rix D
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 10961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Changes in retention strength of luting cements by repeated loading].
    Kakigawa H; Yokoyama Y; Tajima K; Hayashi I; Kozono Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Nov; 8(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 2489593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW; Belser UC; Scherrer SS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10635194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of some dental cements used in orthodontics.
    Sadowsky PL; Retief DH
    Angle Orthod; 1976 Apr; 46(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 776044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three cements used for orthodontic banding of porcelain molars.
    Herion T; Ferracane JL; Covell DA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 17029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 12-month clinical study comparing four glass ionomer cements for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands.
    Fricker JP
    Aust Orthod J; 1989 Mar; 11(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 2701048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.