618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805917)
1. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.
Taylor NG; Ison K
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8805917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A study of frictional resistance of archwires and ligating methods].
Lin HP; Wu JY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Apr; 14(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 15886843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation.
Sims AP; Waters NE; Birnie DJ; Pethybridge RJ
Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):377-85. PubMed ID: 8223972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance.
Baccetti T; Franchi L
Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 16539544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.
Hain M; Dhopatkar A; Rock P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.
Stefanos S; Secchi AG; Coby G; Tanna N; Mante FK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):463-467. PubMed ID: 20889052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frictional resistance in plastic preadjusted brackets ligated with low-friction and conventional elastomeric ligatures.
Ioi H; Yanase Y; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):17-22; discussion 13. PubMed ID: 19286872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static frictional resistance with the slide low-friction elastomeric ligature system.
Jones SP; Ben Bihi S
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 20043548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
