352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8805999)
1. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P
Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of forearm bone mineral density: comparison of precision of five different instruments.
Heilmann P; Wüster C; Prolingheuer C; Götz M; Ziegler R
Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 May; 62(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 9541514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in children and adults.
Ilich JZ; Hsieh LC; Tzagournis MA; Wright JK; Saracoglu M; Barden HS; Matkovic V
Bone; 1994; 15(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 8086236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand.
Bouxsein ML; Michaeli DA; Plass DB; Schick DA; Melton ME
Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 9425502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of reference point selection on DXA-based measurement of forearm bone mineral density.
Yu W; Ying Q; Guan W; Lin Q; Zhang Z; Chen J; Engelke K; Hsieh E
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Nov; 14(1):107. PubMed ID: 31707587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the radius.
Nelson D; Feingold M; Mascha E; Kleerekoper M
Bone Miner; 1992 Jul; 18(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 1422300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.
Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.
Lafferty FW; Rowland DY
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 8931036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?
Ito M; Nishida A; Kono J; Kono M; Uetani M; Hayashi K
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):959-64. PubMed ID: 12955312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Nieves JW; Cosman F; Mars C; Lindsay R
Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Nov; 51(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 1458339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.
Faulkner KG; McClung MR; Schmeer MS; Roberts LA; Gaither KW
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 8055368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in preterm and term infants: evaluation of the methodology.
Sievänen H; Backström MC; Kuusela AL; Ikonen RS; Mäki M
Pediatr Res; 1999 Jan; 45(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 9890616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone mineral density measured by a portable X-ray device agrees with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at forearm in preschool aged children.
Hazell TJ; Vanstone CA; Rodd CJ; Rauch F; Weiler HA
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 22898084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.
Leboff MS; Fuleihan GE; Angell JE; Chung S; Curtis K
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Jul; 7(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 1642152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
