These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8806339)

  • 1. Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 78(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 8806339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.
    Cooklin M; Olsovsky MR; Brockman RG; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 10440146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 May; 31(6):1391-4. PubMed ID: 9581739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of shock polarity on biphasic defibrillation thresholds using an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 9581951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
    Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Kirk MM; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 38(4):1150-5. PubMed ID: 11583896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 9(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 9554728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.
    Bahu M; Knight BP; Weiss R; Hahn SJ; Goyal R; Daoud EG; Man KC; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9869995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system.
    Hodgson DM; Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Daly B; Gold MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 25(4 Pt 1):408-13. PubMed ID: 11991364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defibrillation efficacy comparing a subcutaneous array electrode versus an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator and a subcutaneous array electrode in addition to an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from active can versus array trials I and II.
    Gradaus R; Block M; Seidl K; Brunn J; Isgro F; Hammel D; Hauer B; Breithardt G; Bocker D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 11513444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the addition of an abdominal hot can cardioverter/defibrillator pulse generator on the defibrillation energy requirements in a single-lead endocardial defibrillation system.
    Neuzner J; Schwarz T; Strasser R; Schlepper M; Pitschner H
    Eur Heart J; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 9347278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Submuscular versus subcutaneous pectoral implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators: effect on high voltage pathway impedance and defibrillation efficacy.
    Iskos D; Lock K; Lurie KG; Fahy GJ; Petersen-Stejskal S; Benditt DG
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9869996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.