149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8807245)
1. Evaluation of the 5-year review of negative cervical smears in patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Tabbara SO; Sidawy MK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jul; 15(1):7-10; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 8807245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rescreening in gynecologic cytology. Rescreening of 8096 previous cases for current low-grade and indeterminate-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion diagnoses--a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 323 laboratories.
Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jun; 120(6):519-22. PubMed ID: 8651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency of cervical smear abnormalities within 3 years of normal cytology.
Sawaya GF; Kerlikowske K; Lee NC; Gildengorin G; Washington AE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 96(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10908766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Leung KM; Lam KK; Tse PY; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Aug; 14(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 18685162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical smear histories of 585 women with biopsy-proven carcinoma in situ.
Bergeron C; Debaque H; Ayivi J; Amaizo S; Fagnani F
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1676-80. PubMed ID: 9390123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method in a high-risk population.
Michelow P; McKee G; Hlongwane F
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 16719852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preceding cervical cytology in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Songveeratham S; Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Sribanditmongkol N; Srisomboon J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1381-4. PubMed ID: 20607262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Negative cervical smears before CIN 3/carcinoma. Reevaluation with the PAPNET Testing System.
Doornewaard H; van de Seijp H; Woudt JM; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9022729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical squamous cells and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cervical cytology: cytohistological correlation and implication for management in a low-resource setting.
Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Nijhawan R; Rajwanshi A; Dey P; Suri V; Dhaliwal L
Cytopathology; 2011 Jun; 22(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 20629683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic damage in exfoliated cells of the uterine cervix. Association and interaction between cigarette smoking and progression to malignant transformation?
Cerqueira EM; Santoro CL; Donozo NF; Freitas BA; Pereira CA; Bevilacqua RG; Machado-Santelli GM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 9622681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of AgNOR technique and CEA expression in atypical metaplastic cells from cervical smears.
Rocher AE; Gonzalez A; Palaoro LA; Blanco AM
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2006 Jun; 28(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 16786722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative risk of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion associated with prior abnormal Pap smears.
Collins LC; Niloff J; Burke L; Abu-Jawdeh G; Wang H
J Reprod Med; 2001 Feb; 46(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 11255808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
