These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8807265)

  • 1. Identification of pseudohypacusis using speech recognition thresholds.
    Schlauch RS; Arnce KD; Olson LM; Sanchez S; Doyle TN
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 8807265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
    Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech audiometry in noise-exposed workers: the SRT-PTA relationship revisited.
    Picard M; Banville R; Barbarosie T; Manolache M
    Audiology; 1999; 38(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 10052834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between speech recognition threshold, average hearing level, and speech importance noise detection threshold.
    Letowski T; Hergenreder P; Tang H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1131-6. PubMed ID: 1447923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of American Speech-Language Hearing Association guidelines for obtaining speech-recognition thresholds.
    Jahner JA; Schlauch RA; Doyle T
    Ear Hear; 1994 Aug; 15(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 7958531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status.
    Armstrong NM; Oosterloo BC; Croll PH; Ikram MA; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):897-904. PubMed ID: 32673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in the Elderly].
    von Gablenz P; Holube I
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Nov; 96(11):759-764. PubMed ID: 29132188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified spondee threshold procedure.
    Martin FN; Dowdy LK
    J Aud Res; 1986 Apr; 26(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 3624193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four spondee threshold procedures: a comparison.
    Wall LG; Davis LA; Myers DK
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 6734969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone.
    Smits C; Kapteyn TS; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jan; 43(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 14974624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach for estimating initial sound level for speech reception threshold test.
    Lee H; Park R; Kim S; Cho HH; Won Y
    Technol Health Care; 2024; 32(S1):197-206. PubMed ID: 38759049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Helpful tool in the detection of pseudohypacusis.
    Kvaerner KJ; Engdahl B; Aursnes J; Arnesen AR; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 8881005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digit speech recognition threshold (SRT) in children with normal hearing ages 5-8 years.
    Ramkissoon I; Estis JM; Gaal Flagge A
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 24686505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of pseudohypacusis: a prospective, randomized study of the use of otoacoustic emissions.
    Balatsouras DG; Kaberos A; Korres S; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E; Economou C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):518-827. PubMed ID: 14663351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear function tests in estimation of speech dynamic range.
    Han JJ; Park SY; Park SN; Na MS; Lee P; Han JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 136(10):1041-5. PubMed ID: 27109439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.