These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8807274)

  • 21. Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Blanco JL; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517730526. PubMed ID: 28929903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ewert SD; Oetting D
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Loudness modulation after transient and permanent hearing loss: implications for tinnitus and hyperacusis.
    Fournier P; Schönwiesner M; Hébert S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Dec; 283():64-77. PubMed ID: 25135356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Tampas JW; Burchfield SB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adult auditory learning and training.
    Robinson K; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3 Suppl):51S-65S. PubMed ID: 8807276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The auditory acclimatization effect in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for functional plasticity.
    Philibert B; Collet L; Vesson JF; Veuillet E
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):131-42. PubMed ID: 15953523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reactions to binaural hearing aid fitting.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():197-205. PubMed ID: 6955926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.
    van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Rakerd B; Punch J; Hooks W; Amlani A; Vander Velde TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1285-94. PubMed ID: 10599612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of hearing aid benefit: the role of preferred listening levels.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 8194677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.