These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8809257)

  • 1. Swing-lock design considerations for obturator frameworks.
    Parr GR; Gardner LK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 8809257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: design principles.
    Aramany MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Dec; 40(6):656-62. PubMed ID: 364026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A photoelastic study of stress induced by framework design in a maxillary resection.
    Myers RE; Mitchell DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 May; 61(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 2664145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying basic prosthodontic principles in the dentulous maxillectomy patient.
    Gay WD; King GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Apr; 43(4):433-5. PubMed ID: 6987386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Light-cured combination obturator prosthesis.
    Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 1501188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gravity-induced stresses by an obturator prosthesis.
    Schwartzman B; Caputo AA; Beumer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):466-8. PubMed ID: 2231457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hollow box maxillary obturator.
    Blair FM; Hunter NR
    Br Dent J; 1998 May; 184(10):484-7. PubMed ID: 9642863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid gate design frameworks for the rehabilitation of the maxillectomy patient.
    Marunick M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 15116031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternative method for constructing an obturator prosthesis for a patient with a bilateral cleft lip and palate: a clinical report.
    Gümüş HO; Tuna SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 19368597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of the obturator framework design.
    Parr GR; Gardner LK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):608-10. PubMed ID: 12815356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosthodontic principles in the framework design of maxillary obturator prostheses.
    Parr GR; Tharp GE; Rahn AO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 2668517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obturator design for hemimaxillectomy patients.
    Javid NS; Dadmanesh J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Jul; 36(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 787503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1997 Judson C. Hickey Scientific Writing Awards. An innovative investment method for the fabrication of a closed hollow obturator prosthesis.
    McAndrew KS; Rothenberger S; Minsley GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 9656185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosthetic restoration following maxillary trauma utilising a fixed removable implant-supported prosthesis: a case report.
    Sykes LM; Breitz LR
    SADJ; 2001 Jan; 56(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 16894681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Swing-lock removable partial dentures.
    Roberts HW
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 12016679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary definitive obturators: rationale of design.
    Rogers WA; Salinas TJ; Novoselsky A
    J Dent Technol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):19-26. PubMed ID: 9516265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of acquired maxillary defects in partially edentulous patients.
    Diehl M
    Gen Dent; 1982; 30(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 6759301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary implant-retained partial overdenture with Dolder bar attachment: a clinical report.
    Kim H; Buhite RJ; Monaco EA
    N Y State Dent J; 2015 Mar; 81(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 25928972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and hollow obturator prostheses.
    Wu YL; Schaaf NG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 2760863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification.
    Aramany MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Nov; 40(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 364015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.