158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8809257)
1. Swing-lock design considerations for obturator frameworks.
Parr GR; Gardner LK
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 8809257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: design principles.
Aramany MA
J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Dec; 40(6):656-62. PubMed ID: 364026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A photoelastic study of stress induced by framework design in a maxillary resection.
Myers RE; Mitchell DL
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 May; 61(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 2664145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applying basic prosthodontic principles in the dentulous maxillectomy patient.
Gay WD; King GE
J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Apr; 43(4):433-5. PubMed ID: 6987386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Light-cured combination obturator prosthesis.
Polyzois GL
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 1501188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gravity-induced stresses by an obturator prosthesis.
Schwartzman B; Caputo AA; Beumer J
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):466-8. PubMed ID: 2231457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The hollow box maxillary obturator.
Blair FM; Hunter NR
Br Dent J; 1998 May; 184(10):484-7. PubMed ID: 9642863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid gate design frameworks for the rehabilitation of the maxillectomy patient.
Marunick M
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 15116031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative method for constructing an obturator prosthesis for a patient with a bilateral cleft lip and palate: a clinical report.
Gümüş HO; Tuna SH
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 19368597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of the obturator framework design.
Parr GR; Gardner LK
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):608-10. PubMed ID: 12815356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prosthodontic principles in the framework design of maxillary obturator prostheses.
Parr GR; Tharp GE; Rahn AO
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 2668517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obturator design for hemimaxillectomy patients.
Javid NS; Dadmanesh J
J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Jul; 36(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 787503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 1997 Judson C. Hickey Scientific Writing Awards. An innovative investment method for the fabrication of a closed hollow obturator prosthesis.
McAndrew KS; Rothenberger S; Minsley GE
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 9656185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic restoration following maxillary trauma utilising a fixed removable implant-supported prosthesis: a case report.
Sykes LM; Breitz LR
SADJ; 2001 Jan; 56(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 16894681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Swing-lock removable partial dentures.
Roberts HW
Gen Dent; 2001; 49(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 12016679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary definitive obturators: rationale of design.
Rogers WA; Salinas TJ; Novoselsky A
J Dent Technol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):19-26. PubMed ID: 9516265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of acquired maxillary defects in partially edentulous patients.
Diehl M
Gen Dent; 1982; 30(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 6759301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary implant-retained partial overdenture with Dolder bar attachment: a clinical report.
Kim H; Buhite RJ; Monaco EA
N Y State Dent J; 2015 Mar; 81(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 25928972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and hollow obturator prostheses.
Wu YL; Schaaf NG
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 2760863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification.
Aramany MA
J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Nov; 40(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 364015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
