These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8809959)

  • 41. A blood bank audit of elective gynaecological surgery: a case for group and antibody screen.
    Mackinnon S; Newland L
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1986; 8(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 3757452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preoperative cross-matching in major head and neck surgery: a study of a department's current practice and eligibility for electronic cross-matching.
    Nasr IH; Papineni McIntosh A; Hussain K; Fardy MJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 24021773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A computer-based record system for a hospital transfusion service.
    Eggert AA; Traver MI; Blankenheim TJ
    Transfusion; 1980; 20(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 6766583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A blood ordering strategy for hospital blood banks derived from a computer simulation.
    Friedman BA; Abbott RD; Williams GW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Aug; 78(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 7102816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A novel system for providing compatible blood to patients during surgery: "self-service" electronic blood banking by nursing staff.
    Cheng G; Chiu DS; Chung AS; Wong HF; Chan MW; Lui YK; Choy FM; Chan JC; Chan AH; Lam ST; Fan TC
    Transfusion; 1996 Apr; 36(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 8623138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optimal blood ordering for emergency department patients.
    Clarke JR; Davidson SJ; Bergman GE; Geller NJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1980 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 7356199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [The maximum surgical blood order schedule].
    Oliveira A; Fleming R; Galvão M
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 17376321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
    JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A study of blood cross-matching requirements for surgery in gynecological oncology: improved efficiency and cost saving.
    Foley CL; Mould T; Kennedy JE; Barton DP
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(6):889-93. PubMed ID: 14675329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hemotherapy in elective surgery: an incidence report, review of the literature, and alternatives for guideline appraisal.
    Mead JH; Anthony CD; Sattler M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Aug; 74(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 7405903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Practical Solutions for Problems in Blood Grouping and Crossmatching.
    Andıç N
    Turk J Haematol; 2022 Feb; 39(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 34886658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Surgical blood ordering schedule for better inventory management: An experience from a tertiary care transfusion center.
    Guduri PR; Shastry S; Raturi M; Shenoy A
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2022 Jul; 78(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35855717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Blood transfusion practice in gynaecology and obstetrics. Retrospective audit.
    Galea G; Urbaniak SJ
    Vox Sang; 1994; 67(3):323-5. PubMed ID: 7863637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optimal hemotherapy in elective surgery.
    Michiels JJ; Bruining HA; Kothe FC
    Neth J Surg; 1985 Apr; 37(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 4000516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The use of barcodes to facilitate computerization in blood transfusion.
    Gunson HH
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1981; 3(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 7035060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimizing electronic blood ordering and supporting administration workflows to improve blood utilization in the pediatric hospital setting.
    Stoffel M; Leu MG; Barry D; Hrachovec J; Saifee NH; Migita DS; Deam N; Villavicencio CE; O'Hare MP; Pagliarulo A; Delaney M
    Transfusion; 2023 Dec; 63(12):2328-2340. PubMed ID: 37942518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The analysis of surgical blood order protocol.
    Kozarzewska M; Maćkowiak M; Steler J; Krefta M; Hasak L; Kardel-Reszkiewicz E
    Anestezjol Intens Ter; 2011; 43(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 22011865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Type and screen: a safe and effective preoperative blood ordering policy with emphasis on its use in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Patten E; Alperin JB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 142(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 7058860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Developing techniques in blood transfusion.
    Duguid JK
    Baillieres Clin Haematol; 1990 Oct; 3(4):999-1017. PubMed ID: 2271799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Haemolytic transfusion reactions due to Mi-antibodies; need to include MiltenbergerIII positive cells in pre-transfusion antibody screening in Hong Kong.
    Cheng G; Hui CH; Lam CK; Hal SY; Wong L; Mak KH; Lin CK
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Jun; 17(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 8536423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.