These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8810109)

  • 1. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice.
    Rout PG; Rogers SN; Chapman M; Rippin JW
    Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 8810109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control of the automatic processor.
    Legg LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of 'rapid' processing techniques by a sample of British dentists.
    Horner K; Shearer AC; Rushton VE; Czajka J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 8299834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
    Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
    Geist JR; Gleason MJ
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
    Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
    Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Optimal dental radiography by means of expert film processing].
    Horn C
    Stomatol DDR; 1978 Oct; 28(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 282693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current radiographic techniques that complement implant dentistry--Part I.
    Greenan RW
    Dent Implantol Update; 1996 Jun; 7(6):41-4; 2 p insert. PubMed ID: 9525187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of automated nonroller processing on the sensitometric characteristics of 3 intraoral film types.
    Geist JR; Brand JW; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jul; 96(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 12847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.