114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8811460)
1. Evaluation of automated basophil counting by using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies.
Hübl W; Andert S; Erath A; Streicher J; Bayer PM
J Clin Lab Anal; 1996; 10(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 8811460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral blood monocyte counting: towards a new reference method.
Hübl W; Andert S; Erath A; Lapin A; Bayer PM
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Nov; 33(11):839-45. PubMed ID: 8620061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision and accuracy of monocyte counting. Comparison of two hematology analyzers, the manual differential and flow cytometry.
Hübl W; Hauptlorenz S; Tlustos L; Jilch R; Fischer M; Bayer PM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 7531938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed reference method for peripheral-blood monocyte counting using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies.
Hübl W; Tlustos L; Erath A; Andert S; Bayer PM
Cytometry; 1996 Mar; 26(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8809484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Absolute Basophil Count.
Borzova E
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2163():109-124. PubMed ID: 32766970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The absolute basophil count.
Borzova E; Dahinden CA
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1192():87-100. PubMed ID: 25149486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flowcytometric analysis of basophil counts in human blood and inaccuracy of hematology analyzers.
Ducrest S; Meier F; Tschopp C; Pavlovic R; Dahinden CA
Allergy; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1446-50. PubMed ID: 16197480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a new reference method for the leukocyte five-part differential.
Hübl W; Wolfbauer G; Andert S; Thum G; Streicher J; Hübner C; Lapin A; Bayer PM
Cytometry; 1997 Apr; 30(2):72-84. PubMed ID: 9149914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Japanese Society for Laboratory Hematology flow cytometric reference method of determining the differential leukocyte count: external quality assurance using fresh blood samples.
Kawai Y; Nagai Y; Ogawa E; Kondo H
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Apr; 39(2):202-222. PubMed ID: 28013527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the blood basophil count sufficiently precise, accurate, and specific?: three automated hematology instruments and flow cytometry compared.
Amundsen EK; Henriksson CE; Holthe MR; Urdal P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 22180481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Basophil counting with a new staining method using alcian blue.
Gilbert HS; Ornstein L
Blood; 1975 Aug; 46(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 49201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A short evaluation of a new haematological analyser: the Cobas Argos 5 Diff.
Bas BM; Catsberg MJ; op de Kamp SL
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Sep; 31(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 8260533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human basophils express CD22 without expression of CD19.
Han K; Kim Y; Lee J; Lim J; Lee KY; Kang CS; Kim WI; Kim BK; Shim SI; Kim SM
Cytometry; 1999 Nov; 37(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 10520197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Roche Cobas Argos 5Diff automated haematology analyser with comparison to a Coulter STKS.
Sheridan BL; Lollo M; Howe S; Bergeron N
Clin Lab Haematol; 1994 Jun; 16(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 7955920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of leukocyte differential on the hematology analyzer Celltac G compared with two hematology analyzers, reference flow cytometry method, and two manual methods.
Yamade K; Yamaguchi T; Nagai Y; Kamisako T
J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Aug; 35(8):e23827. PubMed ID: 34117659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliable, accurate determination of the leukocyte differential of leukopenic samples by using Hematoflow method.
Jo Y; Kim SH; Koh K; Park J; Shim YB; Lim J; Kim Y; Park YJ; Han K
Korean J Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 31(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 21779183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the reproducibility of automated monocyte counting using flow cytometry and monoclonal antibodies].
Vives Corrons JL; Besson I; Villamor N; Aymerich M; Marín JL; Jou JM
Sangre (Barc); 1994 Jun; 39(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 7940050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated analysers underestimate atypical basophil count in myeloid neoplasms.
Shah HP; Tormey CA; Siddon AJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2022 Oct; 44(5):831-836. PubMed ID: 35609868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the leukocyte differential flags on an hematologic analyzer. The Cobas Argos 5 Diff.
Lacombe F; Cazaux N; Briais A; Labroille G; Puntous M; Reiffers J; Belloc F; Boisseau MR; Bernard P
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 7572808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
