These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8812966)

  • 1. A perspective on carcinogen risk assessment. Toxicology Forum, Washington DC, February 19, 1996.
    Moolenaar RJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Jun; 23(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 8812966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carcinogen assessment jeopardised by new procedures.
    Furlow B
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 Jun; 9(6):518. PubMed ID: 18536121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putting chemicals on a path to better risk assessment.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5941):694-5. PubMed ID: 19661414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Why not use it all?" Another view.
    Landrigan PJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Nov; 107(11):A546. PubMed ID: 10627174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk assessment at the EPA: an agency self-exam.
    Schmidt CW
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Jun; 112(8):A482-5. PubMed ID: 15175195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EPA risk assessment principles and practices. BOSC (board of scientific counselors) workshop, February 2-3, 2005, Washington, DC.
    Henderson RF; Stewart J; Daston GP; Duke CS; Farland W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2005 Nov; 12(6):388-90. PubMed ID: 16305146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the science and art of risk assessment.
    Doull J
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 8744586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handle us with care.
    Hay A
    Nature; 1979 Jul; 280(5717):8-9. PubMed ID: 15305576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the city safe?
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7063):1207-8. PubMed ID: 16251908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Declaring chemicals "not carcinogenic to humans" requires validation, not speculation.
    Melnick RL; Kamel F; Huff J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Apr; 111(4):A203-4. PubMed ID: 12676636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Support of science-based decisions concerning the evaluation of the toxicology of mixtures: a new beginning.
    Teuschler L; Klaunig J; Carney E; Chambers J; Conolly R; Gennings C; Giesy J; Hertzberg R; Klaassen C; Kodell R; Paustenbach D; Yang R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Aug; 36(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 12383716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental Immunotoxicology and Risk Assessment. Proceedings of a workshop. 12-13 June 2001, Washington, DC, USA.
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2002; 21(9-10):469-572. PubMed ID: 12458902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A toxicologist's view of cancer risk assessment.
    Rozman KK; Kerecsen L; Viluksela MK; Osterle D; Deml E; Viluksela M; Stahl BU; Greim H; Doull J
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):29-52. PubMed ID: 8744588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toxicology. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5494):1071. PubMed ID: 11184998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of mode of action studies in extrapolating to human risks in toxicology.
    Lock EA; Smith LL
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():317-22. PubMed ID: 12676480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: critical overview and deficiencies in toxicology and risk assessment for human health.
    Harvey PW; Everett DJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Mar; 20(1):145-65. PubMed ID: 16522525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    Albert RE
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 1994; 24(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 8172652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EPA's new guidance for assessing cancer risks from early life exposures: genotoxic mode of action and implications for human health-based standards.
    Borgert CJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 15950346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.