104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8812967)
1. An alternative approach to the analysis of animal carcinogenicity studies.
Stallard N; Whitehead A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Jun; 23(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 8812967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies--implications for REACH.
Wells MY; Williams ES
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 19126422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Highlights of International meeting on Alternative Methods of Carcinogenicity Testing, Leesburg, VA, November 1-3, 2000, Sponsored by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute.
Jollow DJ
J Agromedicine; 2004; 9(2):427-9. PubMed ID: 19785235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Chemical carcinogens: screening, testing, risk assessment for man.
Schramm T; Teichmann B
Neoplasma; 1981; 28(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 7254431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and possible use of in silico tools for carcinogenicity within REACH legislation.
Milan C; Schifanella O; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2011 Oct; 29(4):300-23. PubMed ID: 22107165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous analysis of different tumor types in a long-term carcinogenicity study with scheduled sacrifices.
Wahrendorf J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1983 May; 70(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 6573536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 5,5-Diphenylhydantoin (CAS No. 57-41-0) (Phenytoin) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 1993 Nov; 404():1-303. PubMed ID: 12621514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical design of toxicity assays: role of genetic structure of test animal population.
Haseman JK; Hoel DG
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1979 Jan; 5(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 423309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The assessment of low-dose carcinogenicity.
Armitage P
Biometrics; 1982 Mar; 38 Suppl():119-39. PubMed ID: 7046818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of multiple tumor data from a rodent carcinogenicity experiment.
Finkelstein DM; Schoenfeld DA
Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 2720052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive value of animal data in human cancer risk assessment.
Meijers JM; Swaen GM; Bloemen LJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Apr; 25(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 9185886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Determination of the effective number of animals to be used in oncologic experiments, and in testing for carcinogenicity, in particular].
Turusov VS
Vopr Onkol; 2002; 48(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 12101566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
