104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8812967)
21. Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system.
Knight A; Bailey J; Balcombe J
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():139-47. PubMed ID: 16555967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Carcinogenic chemical-response "fingerprint" for male F344 rats exposed to a series of 195 chemicals: implications for predicting carcinogens with transgenic models.
Johnson FM
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):234-45. PubMed ID: 10618171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Poly-k-trend tests for survival adjusted analysis of tumor rates formulated as approximate multiple contrast test.
Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(5):934-48. PubMed ID: 18781526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Jan; (520):4-246. PubMed ID: 16628245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Statistical methods in the study of carcinogenicity in animal experiments].
Maksimovich DM; Parfenov IuD
Vopr Onkol; 1990; 36(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 2184580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The in vivo rodent test systems for assessment of carcinogenic potential.
van der Laan JW; Spindler P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 11846641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods.
Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Cimino MC; Benz RD; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 16352383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A classification framework and practical guidance for establishing a mode of action for chemical carcinogens.
Butterworth BE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 16530901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals.
Greim HA
Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 19034432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. NTP carcinogenesis studies of 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3-propanediol, nitromethane, and 1,2,3-trichloropropane (cas nos. 3296-90-0, 75-52-5, and 96-18-4) in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) (Waterborne Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2005 Oct; (528):1-190. PubMed ID: 16362062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of statistics when examining lifetime studies in rodents to detect carcinogenicity.
Salsburg DS
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1977 Nov; 3(4):611-28. PubMed ID: 592429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test?
Lammer E; Carr GJ; Wendler K; Rawlings JM; Belanger SE; Braunbeck T
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 149(2):196-209. PubMed ID: 19095081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Literature review on the genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity of ethyl methanesulfonate.
Gocke E; Bürgin H; Müller L; Pfister T
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 19857796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
Box RJ; Spielmann H
Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On the efficiency of age-adjusted tests in animal carcinogenicity experiments.
Gart JJ; Tarone RE
Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):235-44. PubMed ID: 3567308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Exact significance levels for multiple binomial testing with application to carcinogenicity screens.
Brown CC; Fears TR
Biometrics; 1981 Dec; 37(4):763-74. PubMed ID: 7337794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
