BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8813961)

  • 21. Negative cytology preceding cervical cancer: causes and prevention.
    Robertson JH; Woodend B
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Aug; 46(8):700-2. PubMed ID: 8408692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation of cytotechnologists' parameters with their performance in rapid prescreening of papanicolaou smears.
    Djemli A; Khetani K; Case BW; Auger M
    Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 16948125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
    Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.
    Shield PW; Cox NC
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 9577734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of false negative rates between 100% rapid review and 10% random full rescreening as internal quality control methods in cervical cytology screening.
    Lee BC; Lam SY; Walker T
    Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 19534266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The characteristics of false negative cervical smears--implications for the UK cervical cancer screening programme.
    Baker RW; O'Sullivan JP; Hanley J; Coleman DV
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 May; 52(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 10560356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characteristics of high grade dyskaryotic cervical smears likely to be missed on rapid rescreening.
    O'Sullivan JP; Chapman PA; Jenkins L; Smith R
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10667157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of error in calculating the false-negative rate in the interpretation of cervicovaginal smears: the need to review abnormal cases.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):264-71. PubMed ID: 9349512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
    Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effectiveness of cytological rescreening in the reduction of false negative/positive Pap reports.
    Cernescu EC; Anton G; Ruţă S; Cernescu C
    Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 2013; 72(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 24187808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pap smears with glandular cell abnormalities: Are they detected by rapid prescreening?
    Kanber Y; Charbonneau M; Auger M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 123(12):739-44. PubMed ID: 26348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Computer-assisted rescreening of cervicovaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou method. Evaluation of the PAPNET system apropos of 225 cases].
    Vuong PN; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Marsan C; Baviera E
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7574913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rescreening in cervical cytology for quality control. When bad data is worse than no data or what works, what doesn't, and why.
    Renshaw AA
    Clin Lab Med; 2003 Sep; 23(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 14560535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of rapid prescreening and 10% rescreening in liquid-based Papanicolaou testing.
    Currens HS; Nejkauf K; Wagner L; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 22180489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
    Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.
    Baker A; Melcher D; Smith R
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1002-4. PubMed ID: 8543619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology.
    Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An approach to the problem of false negatives in gynecologic cytologic screening.
    Hindman WM
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 2686323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.