104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814048)
1. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three methods of using the DermaPIK with the standard prick method for epicutaneous skin testing.
Corder WT; Wilson NW
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Nov; 75(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 7583866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC
Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children.
Roovers MH; Gerth van Wijk R; Dieges PH; van Toorenenbergen AW
Ann Allergy; 1990 Feb; 64(2 Pt 1):166-9. PubMed ID: 1689560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
dos Santos RV; Titus RG; Lima HC
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot study of the validation of percutaneous testing in cats.
Rossi MA; Messinger L; Olivry T; Hoontrakoon R
Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):488-e115. PubMed ID: 23826630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of skin prick test reactions with a scanning program.
Pijnenborg H; Nilsson L; Dreborg S
Allergy; 1996 Nov; 51(11):782-8. PubMed ID: 8947335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefulness of skin prick test using bifurcated needle for the diagnosis of food allergy in infantile atopic dermatitis--1st report. Case of egg allergy].
Ogata M; Sukuya A; Sugizaki C; Ikematsu K; Imai T; Tachimoto H; Ebisawa M
Arerugi; 2008 Jul; 57(7):843-52. PubMed ID: 18688185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.
Pagani M; Antico A; Cilia M; Calabrò D; Poto S; Pecora S; Burastero SE
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2009 Feb; 41(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19496349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intradermal tests using vasomotor agents in allergic rhinitis].
Milosević DN; Janosević LjB; Janosević SB
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(11-12):357-62. PubMed ID: 11337913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal skin prick wheal size for diagnosis of cat allergy.
Zarei M; Remer CF; Kaplan MS; Staveren AM; Lin CK; Razo E; Goldberg B
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Jun; 92(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 15237761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical evaluation of the use of skin tests and cellular tests in standardization of allergens.
de Weck AL; Derer T
Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 1994; (87):89-114; discussion 114-7. PubMed ID: 7873071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.
Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Søborg M; Biering I
Allergy; 1983 Jul; 38(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 6614408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
