104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814048)
21. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The influence of atopic status and potential risk factors for sensitization on histamine skin reactivity in unselected Belgian children.
Van Gysel D; Govaere E; Verhamme K; Doli E; De Baets F
Pediatr Dermatol; 2007; 24(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 17845156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices.
Dykewicz MS; Dooms KT; Chassaing DL
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2011; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 21703099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relative potency of fexofenadine HCl 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, and placebo using a skin test model of wheal-and-flare suppression.
Kaliner MA; White MV; Economides A; Crisalida T; Hale M; Liao Y; Christian CD; Georges GC; Woodworth TH; Meeves SG
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2003 Jun; 90(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 12839321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing.
Nelson HS; Lopez P; Curran-Everett D
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2014; 35(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 24433598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices.
Engler DB; DeJarnatt AC; Sim TC; Lee JL; Grant JA
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):985-91. PubMed ID: 1460202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices.
Yoon IK; Martin BL; Carr WW; ;
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2006; 27(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 17176781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe.
Masse MS; Granger Vallée A; Chiriac A; Dhivert-Donnadieu H; Bousquet-Rouanet L; Bousquet PJ; Demoly P
Allergy; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1415-9. PubMed ID: 21797883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The allergy pricker. Qualitative aspects of skin prick testing using a precision needle.
Malling HJ; Andersen CE; Boas MB; Holgersen F; Munch EP; Weeke B
Allergy; 1982 Nov; 37(8):563-7. PubMed ID: 7181052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparative study of 3 types of lancets for performing prick tests].
Montalvo A; Martín S; Mesa A; Cortés C; Rodríguez M; Laso MT
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1996; 24(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 8992889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Use of thermographic methods for estimation of skin prick test results. II. Evaluation of skin prick test results with histamine solutions of different concentration using liquid crystal mixtures].
Zuber J; Kruszewski J; Zmija J; Kłosowicz S; Jung A
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 1996; 64(3-4):123-31. PubMed ID: 8754955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Specific skin reactions induced by individual pollen preparations in hypersensitivity persons].
Paranos S; Petrović S; Vojović I
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(9-10):362-7. PubMed ID: 9863408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Onset and duration of action of topical antihistamine: a study of histamine skin test response.
Danarti R; Waskito F; Indrastuti N
Int J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):861-3. PubMed ID: 18717873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system.
Nolte H; DuBuske LM
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1997 Jul; 79(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 9236496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laser skin testing.
Kardassakis DG; Grekin RC; LeBoit PE
Ann Allergy; 1992 Mar; 68(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 1546824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Multi-Test II skin prick testing to intradermal dilutional testing.
Simons JP; Rubinstein EN; Kogut VJ; Melfi PJ; Ferguson BJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 15138417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and skin test inhibition of cetirizine and astemizole.
Berkowitz RB; Dockhorn R; Lockey R; Findlay S; Howland WC; Mitchell DQ; Woehler T
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Apr; 76(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 8612120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of intradermal and prick tests based on samples of the most common allergens in the Zadar region].
Mazzi A
Lijec Vjesn; 1995; 117(3-4):76-9. PubMed ID: 8538357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consistency of the efficacy of cetirizine and ebastine on skin reactivity.
Frossard N; Melac M; Benabdesselam O; Pauli G
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Jan; 80(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9475569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of intradermal skin tests in the evaluation of clinically relevant respiratory allergy assessed using patient history and nasal challenges.
Schwindt CD; Hutcheson PS; Leu SY; Dykewicz MS
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Jun; 94(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 15984593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
