BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814048)

  • 41. Comparison of the effects of desloratadine and levocetirizine on histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch in human skin.
    Denham KJ; Boutsiouki P; Clough GF; Church MK
    Inflamm Res; 2003 Oct; 52(10):424-7. PubMed ID: 14520518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Comparison of 4 skin prick tests to detect immediate hypersensitivity].
    Ortega Cisneros M; Ramos García BC; del Río Navarro BE; Sienra Monge JJ
    Rev Alerg Mex; 1998; 45(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 9650494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of photoaging on skin test response to histamine independent of chronologic age.
    King MJ; Phillips SE; Lockey RF
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Dec; 113(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 25446191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Similar rapid onset of action and magnitude of effect of fexofenadine and cetirizine as assessed by inhibition of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare reaction.
    Purohit A; N'Gom AS; Deslandes B; Pauli G; Frossard N
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Dec; 93(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15609766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [The use of laser Doppler flowmetry for assessment of skin prick tests with histamine solutions and allergens].
    Zakrzewski A; Kruszewski J; Kłos K; Lademann A
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Mar; 18(105):282-6. PubMed ID: 15997633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Introduction to in vivo allergy testing.
    Anon JB
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 Sep; 109(3 Pt 2):593-600. PubMed ID: 8414587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Vasomotor skin tests in non-eosinophilic and eosinophilic long-term (perennial) nonallergic rhinitis].
    Milosević DN; Janosević LjB; Janosević SB
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(3-4):84-9. PubMed ID: 10932615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Standardization of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods.
    Basomba A; Sastre A; Peláez A; Romar A; Campos A; García-Villalmanzo A
    Allergy; 1985 Aug; 40(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 4051141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. History of penicillin allergy and referral for skin testing: evaluation of a pediatric penicillin allergy testing program.
    Langley JM; Halperin SA; Bortolussi R
    Clin Invest Med; 2002 Oct; 25(5):181-4. PubMed ID: 12375719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The precision of intracutaneous skin test with timothy pollen allergen preparation using two different techniques.
    Dreborg S; Nilsson G; Zetterström O
    Ann Allergy; 1987 Jan; 58(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 3800053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Response to histamine in the skin prick test in children].
    Kos R; Nestorović B; Maticki D; Janić D
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1990; 118(5-6):193-6. PubMed ID: 2075540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Efficiency of different skin prick testing methods in the diagnosis of allergy to dog.
    Vanto T
    Ann Allergy; 1983 May; 50(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 6846924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Twenty-four hours of activity of cetirizine and fexofenadine in the skin.
    Purohit A; Duvernelle C; Melac M; Pauli G; Frossard N
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Apr; 86(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 11345280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Comparison of two lancets in the skin prick test].
    Castro Almarales RL; Primo Valdés SI; González León M; Navarro Viltre BI; Alvarez Castañeda M; Irarragorri Toledo C; Ronquillo Díaz M; García Gómez I; Labrada Rosado A
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2005; 52(5):188-93. PubMed ID: 16579181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE
    Masukane S; Matsui T; Tokumo N; Makino A; Kitamura K; Takasato Y; Sugiura S; Ito K
    Arerugi; 2022; 71(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 35831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of Duotip-Test.
    Stryk SV; Slavin RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1997 Jan; 99(1 Pt 1):149-50. PubMed ID: 9003223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Colour change in the human histamine wheal made visible by LYYN: a technique to enhance colour differences.
    Holm O; Lindell E; Malm L
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Nov; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 20923457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing.
    Carr WW; Martin B; Howard RS; Cox L; Borish L;
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Aug; 116(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 16108145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.
    Andersen HH; Lundgaard AC; Petersen AS; Hauberg LE; Sharma N; Hansen SD; Elberling J; Arendt-Nielsen L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156211. PubMed ID: 27213613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reproducibility of skin prick test results in epidemiologic studies: a comparison of two devices.
    Illi S; Garcia-Marcos L; Hernando V; Guillen JJ; Liese A; von Mutius E
    Allergy; 1998 Apr; 53(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 9574876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.