These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814565)

  • 21. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1006-8, 1009-11. PubMed ID: 9533310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of an adhesive bonding system on wear resistance of resin composite restorations.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Katoh Y
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Oct; 28(10):687-93. PubMed ID: 9477890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of Thermal Stress on Simulated Localized and Generalized Wear of Nanofilled Resin Composites.
    Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 29949478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wear rates of resin composites.
    Barkmeier WW; Erickson RI; Latta MA; Wilwerding TM
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 22856679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using implant connectors to support clinical abrasion probes: a methodological study.
    Wiskott HW; Perriard J; Scherrer SS; Bois N; Belser UC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1289-95. PubMed ID: 17239945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Confirmation of Leinfelder clinical wear standards.
    Bayne SC; Taylor DF; Rekow ED; Wilder AD; Heymann HO
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jan; 10(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7995469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins.
    Lee YK; Lu H; Oguri M; Powers JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 16198175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A regression analysis of filler particle content to predict composite wear.
    Jaarda MJ; Wang RF; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 9029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of three variables on the accuracy and variability of electroplated copper dies.
    Cassimaty EM; Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 9171493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Occlusal wear of provisional implant-supported restorations.
    Santing HJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Werner A; Feilzer AJ; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 23594356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials.
    Kenyon BJ; Hagge MS; Leknius C; Daniels WC; Weed ST
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15733132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM.
    Lauvahutanon S; Takahashi H; Oki M; Arksornnukit M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 26235715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of Thermal Cycling on Flexural Properties and Simulated Wear of Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Resin Composites.
    Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 27802120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators - supplement to the round robin test of 2005.
    Heintze SD; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e1-9. PubMed ID: 20888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.