These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814565)

  • 41. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantification of in vitro produced wear sites on composite resins using contact profilometry and CCD microscopy: a methodological investigation.
    Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Finger W; Kanehira M; Iwasaki N; Aoyagi Y
    J Med Dent Sci; 2012 Jun; 59(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 23896996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology.
    Persson AS; Andersson M; Odén A; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1123-30. PubMed ID: 18336900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Occlusal margin defects around different types of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth.
    Bryant RW; Marzbani N; Hodge KV
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(6):215-21. PubMed ID: 1303514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear].
    Schmidlin PR; Pasqualetti T; Imfeld T; Besek M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear.
    Leinfelder KF; Suzuki S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Sep; 130(9):1347-53. PubMed ID: 10492543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():9-18. PubMed ID: 8935089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.
    Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A novel approach to evaluating the reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL; Ward S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 15089938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Restoration of occlusal structure by direct tooth coating materials].
    van Pelt AW; Derksen HB; de Jong HP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Jun; 110(6):223-8. PubMed ID: 12852057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.
    Poon EC; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1533-40. PubMed ID: 16329416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
    Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy.
    Dietz W; Montag R; Kraft U; Walther M; Sigusch BW; Gaengler P
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):959-69. PubMed ID: 24814136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?
    Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):689-92. PubMed ID: 16563492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Wear behavior of seven artificial resin teeth assessed with three-dimensional measurements.
    Hao Z; Yin H; Wang L; Meng Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1507-12. PubMed ID: 24993378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Two-body wear simulation influence on some direct and indirect dental resin biocomposites - A qualitative analysis.
    Caracostea A; Morar N; Florea A; Soanca A; Badea ME
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 27840440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
    St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.